Gigi Reyes denies delaying case, insists judge should inhibit | Inquirer News

Gigi Reyes denies delaying case, insists judge should inhibit

/ 02:30 PM July 06, 2017

Lawyer Jessica “Gigi” Reyes. POOL PHOTO

Lawyer Jessica Lucila “Gigi” Reyes, the detained chief of staff of former senator Juan Ponce Enrile, denied that she was delaying her plunder trial by insisting that Sandiganbayan Presiding Justice Amparo Cabotaje Tang inhibit from her case.

Reyes is insisting on her motion for the inhibition of Tang, whom she says has predetermined her guilt in the pork barrel scam case.

Article continues after this advertisement

In her reply to the state prosecutors’ opposition, Reyes said her motion against Tang was “not a dilatory tactic” and not “groundless,” but an “availment… of a remedy sanctioned by the Rules of Court and settled jurisprudence which is predicated on solid factual and legal grounds.”

FEATURED STORIES

READ: Gigi Reyes seeks inhibition of top Sandigan justice in plunder case 

Reyes said there was nothing “irregular” or “questionable” in her bid to have Tang inhibit from her case. She noted that the prosecution had not established that she was benefitting from the delay of the case.

Article continues after this advertisement

“(T)he prosecution has not alleged, moreso established, any benefit which accused Reyes will gain in delaying the case, considering that she has been, and still is, under detention for the past three years since the Court  ordered her arrest,” Reyes said in her reply.

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: Gigi Reyes seeks Sandigan’s nod to post bail 

Article continues after this advertisement

Reyes maintained that Tang committed grave abuse of discretion and “pre-determined” her guilt when the magistrate penned the resolution that denied the bail application of alleged pork barrel scam mastermind Janet Lim-Napoles.

Reyes lamented that she was a “stranger” in Napoles’ bail application but was implicated in Tang’s resolution.

Article continues after this advertisement

“(A)ccused Reyes was a stranger to the bail proceedings of accused Napoles… (T)he Honorable Chairperson made specific findings of culpability against accused Reyes involving an incident pertaining solely to accused Napoles’ petition for bail, where accused Reyes did not participate and was not given the opportunity to be heard,” Reyes’ motion read.

In Tang’s resolution, the court said there was no direct evidence to show that then-senator Enrile received the alleged kickbacks from Napoles, but there was “more than compelling evidence” that Reyes received Enrile’s share from the alleged agent Ruby Tuason.

Furthermore, Reyes said the prosecution’s opposition to her motion was silent on Tang’s alleged “inconsistent positions” when the presiding justice “erroneously” ruled that Enrile did not take any action when the prosecution submitted the Bill of Particulars that the former secured from the Supreme Court.

Reyes said Enrile in fact cited the bill of particulars in his motion to quash the information, which Tang even denied.

“In thus taking inconsistent positions and disregarding the established facts on record… the Honorable Chairperson committed grave abuse of discretion,” Reyes said in her motion.

Reyes also rejected the prosecution’s claim that Tang’s proclamation of Reyes’ alleged guilt was a “mere summary” of the prosecution evidence, adding that Tang’s pronouncements were “premature and specific findings” on Reyes’ alleged criminal liability.

Reyes said Tang placed upon her the burden to prove her innocence even before a trial.

“It cannot hide the glaring fact that the above-cited findings clearly evince that the Honorable Chairperson Tang has prematurely found accused Reyes criminally liable for the offense of plunder charged before trial and virtually placed upon her the onus of proving her innocence before trial,” Reyes’ motion read.

In her motion for Tang’s recusal, Reyes said she also adopted the motion for inhibition that Enrile filed against Tang.

Enrile, the main suspect in the plunder case, hinted that former President Benigno Aquino III’s appointment of Tang as top anti-graft justice might have influenced her decision-making in the pork barrel scam case.

READ: Enrile seeks inhibition of Sandiganbayan’s top justice

While the Supreme Court allowed Enrile to post bail, Reyes, who was accused of serving as Enrile’s agent, remains detained in Camp Bagong Diwa in Taguig since her surrender in 2014.

Enrile was accused of receiving P172.8 million in kickbacks from his alleged ghost pork barrel projects. CBB/rga

 

RELATED STORIES

Like Enrile, Gigi Reyes loses appeal to junk plunder case

Gigi Reyes complained her kickback short of P500K, witness tells court

Gigi Reyes confronts PDI reporter over story on designer bag, shoes

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

In The Know: Rumors linking Enrile to Gigi Reyes started in 1998

TAGS: favors of office, Gigi Reyes, News, Sandiganbayan

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.