SC denies Revilla plea to inhibit Carpio | Inquirer News

SC denies Revilla plea to inhibit Carpio

/ 06:56 PM October 13, 2014

Sen. Bong Revilla. INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

Sen. Bong Revilla. INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines – The Supreme Court has rejected the plea of Senator Ramon “Bong” Revilla Jr. for the inhibition of Senior Associate Justice Antonio Carpio.

Revilla sought the inhibition of Carpio due to his relationship with Ombudsman Conchita Carpio-Morales. Morales approved the filing of plunder and graft cases against Revilla which he is questioning before the high court. The Ombudsman and Justice Carpio are cousins.

Article continues after this advertisement

On the other hand, Associate Justice Martin Villarama inhibited from Revilla’s petition because his wife, former Supreme Court en banc Clerk of Court Ma. Luisa Villarama, is an Ombudsman consultant.

FEATURED STORIES

Revilla wants the high court to stop the plunder and graft proceedings before the Sandiganbayan.

In his petition, he said Ombudsman Carpio-Morales committed grave abuse of discretion in issuing the joint resolution dated March 28, 2014 that has found probable cause to charge him with plunder.

Article continues after this advertisement

He added that his rights to due process have been violated when the Ombudsman denied his request that he be given copies of evidence against him so he can properly air his side.

Article continues after this advertisement

The Ombudsman said his defenses are better presented at a full blown trial.

Article continues after this advertisement

RELATED STORIES

Revilla P87M deposits found

Article continues after this advertisement

Bong Revilla turns to reading the Bible 

Bong Revilla gets first taste of jail life

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Bong Revilla, Nation, News, plunder case

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.