Gov’t gives up fight to restore penal provisions in RH law | Inquirer News

Gov’t gives up fight to restore penal provisions in RH law

/ 04:37 PM April 30, 2014

PRO-RH LAW Proponents of the RH law gather in front of Supreme Court displaying portraits of poor children. INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines—The government opted not to appeal the Supreme Court’s decision that nullifies the penal provisions of the Reproductive Health Law.

Last April 8, the high court ruled that the RH law is not unconstitutional and at the same time nullified the penal provisions of the law.

Article continues after this advertisement

The government, through the Office of the Solicitor-General, received the high court’s decision last April 11 and the deadline to file a motion for reconsideration was last April 26.

FEATURED STORIES

Health Secretary Enrique Ona, in a statement made Wednesday, said “with the help of our legal advisers, we now fully understand the nature of the SC Decision and its implications on program implementation.”

“As far as we are concerned, the SC Justices essentially clarified that all government health facilities are still required to provide modern family planning services, and that there are many legal ways to ensure access to RH services even if there are conscientious objectors, among many other clarifications,” Ona said.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Every mother giving birth, every child about to be born, and all women looking for the best options to take care of their families can no longer wait,” the Health Chief added.

Article continues after this advertisement

On Tuesday, religious groups filed an appeal with the high court asking that it reinstate the provisions it has nullified.

Article continues after this advertisement

In a 30-page motion for reconsideration, the groups told the high court to reconsider its April 8 ruling that nullified Sections 7, 17 and 23 of the law.

Section 7 is about access to family planning, which provides, among others, that no person shall be denied information and access to family planning services.

Article continues after this advertisement

Section 17 on the other hand requires health workers to render free reproductive health service for indigent women as a prerequisite in securing PhilHealth accreditation;

Section 23, on the other hand, provides that penalties against those who will violate the RH Law.

Some of the penalties nullified are for those who will refuse to perform legal and medically safe reproductive health procedures to minors without parental consent and to married individuals without the spouse’s consent.

RELATED STORIES

SC: RH law constitutional

RH law supporters, opponents await SC ruling

Anti-RH group girds for judgment day, sees slim win in SC

7 of 10 Filipino adults favor RH law – SWS survey

RH advocates launch vigil, mass action ahead of SC judgment day

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

RH advocates stage vigil as ruling nears

TAGS: Nation, News, RH law

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.