Makabayan solons refile bill exempting poll workers' pay from tax | Inquirer News
after recent Palace veto

Makabayan solons refile bill exempting poll workers’ pay from tax

/ 10:00 PM August 10, 2022
The House of Representatives’ Makabayan bloc has refiled the bill seeking to remove taxes on the pay of poll workers rendering service during the local and national elections — a proposal from the 18th Congress that President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. had already vetoed.

Makabayan bloc oppose the anti-terror law before the Supreme Court. FILE PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines — The House of Representatives’ Makabayan bloc has refiled the bill seeking to remove taxes on the pay of poll workers rendering service during the local and national elections — a proposal from the 18th Congress that President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. had already vetoed.

Makabayan lawmakers, composed of Gabriela Rep. Arlene Brosas, Kabataan Rep. Raoul Manuel, and Alliance of Concerned Teachers Rep. France Castro stressed in House Bill No. 3271’s explanatory note that removing taxes on the income of poll workers would only cost the government P138 million, which they believe can be offset by progressive tax measures.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The alleged reason (of Marcos): ‘to correct the inequity in the country’s tax system and negate the progressivity of the reforms introduced.’  However, the annualized revenue loss for this measure, as cited by another proponent and Ways and Means Chairperson Rep. Joey Salceda, is a mere P138.6 million,” the group said.

“And while this loss means so little to the national coffers — as it surely will be offset by truly progressive tax measures that levy more from the rich than the poor and the middle class — this amount means so much to the thousands of teachers and other poll service volunteers who rely on whatever benefits and savings they can get,” they added.

FEATURED STORIES

The lawmakers also countered Marcos’ beliefs that providing tax breaks to those who did poll work would be “inequitable” to those who did not experience incentives, stressing that not providing a small help to teachers and other workers beset by rising prices of goods is the definition of “inequitable.”

“Indeed, there is nothing more inequitable than depriving much from those who can hardly afford their basic needs, especially during these times of unabated inflation,” Makabayan noted.

If enacted, House Bill No. 3271 would remove tax from the honoraria, travel allowance, and other benefits provided by the Commission on Elections to people doing elections service under Republic Act No. 10756 or the Election Service Reform Act.

It could be remembered that days after his State of the Nation Address, Marcos vetoed the reconciled versions of Senate Bill No. 2520 and House Bill No. 9652 filed and approved by the 18th Congress for the reasons mentioned above.

Marcos said that the proposal would counter the tax reforms initiated by Republic Act No. 10963, or the Tax Reform for Acceleration and Inclusion (TRAIN) law.  As a result, teachers who worked for extended hours during the recent elections — especially those who encountered malfunctioning vote counting machines — protested and called out the administration for being “insensitive.”

READ: Marcos vetoes bill allowing tax breaks for poll workers | Teachers decry veto of tax break for election service 

That was Marcos’ fifth veto in just a month, including the bill that would have created the Bulacan Airport City Special Ecozone, as he expressed concern about the tax perks that would be given, which again runs contrary to tax reforms.

READ: Bongbong Marcos vetoes bill on Bulacan Airport City ecozone 

JPV
Read Next
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: Bongbong Marcos, Makabayan bloc, Palace, poll workers, Tax, Tax Exemption, veto
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter



© Copyright 1997-2022 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.