Health workers ask Bongbong Marcos: Pick 'responsive' DOH chief with good track record | Inquirer News

Health workers ask Bongbong Marcos: Pick ‘responsive’ DOH chief with good track record

/ 06:24 PM June 08, 2022

Health workers ask Bongbong Marcos: Pick 'responsive' DOH chief with good track record

FILE PHOTO: A member of the Alliance of Health Workers holds a sign at a protest in front of the Department of Health’s main office in Manila on Wednesday, November 24, 2021. (Photo from the Facebook page of the Alliance of Health Workers)

MANILA, Philippines — A group of health workers who have been on the frontlines of the call for better conditions during the COVID-19 surges has asked President-elect Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos to select a health secretary that is responsive to their concerns.

Aside from that, the Alliance of Health Workers (AHW) said in a statement on Wednesday that they prefer that the next Department of Health (DOH) chief have a good track record in good governance to ensure that the interests of patients and health workers would be prioritized.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Our prospect is a DOH chief who is audient and responsive to the legitimate issues and concerns of the health workers for safety, protection, rights and welfare, and the health of the people. A DOH chief who sees us, health workers, as partners in providing quality health services for the people,” AHW national president Robert Mendoza said.

FEATURED STORIES

“We prefer a health chief who has an excellent track record on good governance, accountability, and integrity, and one who will wholeheartedly serve the people,” he added.

Mendoza in particular said the next DOH secretary should have no attachments to the Pharmally issue. Pharmally has been a subject of a congressional probe following findings of the Commission on Audit (COA) on the pandemic spending of the DOH.

Article continues after this advertisement

“We strongly reject a DOH chief who has records of being involved in anomalous transactions like the Pharmally deal and one who has a record of gross negligence in the disposition of medicines and medical supplies as many of these were only stored in DOH warehouses and eventually expired and wasted amidst many patients are deprived of accessing free medicines, supplies, and medical health services,” Mendoza said.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Moreover, health workers are deeply disappointed knowing about the injustice done in tackling the Pharmally anomaly. We will never forget that during the earliest surge of the pandemic, many have died including our fellow health workers, due to negligence and incompetence of the DOH and Duterte administration,” he added.

Article continues after this advertisement

The COA in a report marked DOH’s deficiencies in its P67.32 billion COVID-19 funds for 2020. Specifically, the COA said the DOH has a deficiency of P42 billion, including funds that the agency transferred to the Procurement Service of the Department of Budget and Management (PS-DBM) for pandemic supplies.

READ: COA finds DOH lacking in managing P67.32-B COVID funds 

Article continues after this advertisement

One of the companies that were tapped by PS-DBM to provide COVID-19 supplies to the government was Pharmally Pharmaceutical Corp. with contracts amounting to P8.7 billion – despite the company having a small paid-up capital of P625,000.

READ: P8.7-B med supply deals went to tiny company

There were also claims from senators that the prices of personal protective equipment like masks and face shields that Pharmally supplied were overpriced with face masks costing around P28 apiece when local manufacturers were selling them at P13 each.

READ: Pharmally overpriced sales to gov’t – Drilon

Involved government officials and personnel justified the deal with Pharmally, asserting that the cost of emergency procurement was high because of supply shortage at the start of the pandemic.

READ: Ex-procurement chief insists no overprice in purchase of PPE supplies

‘Protect free speech’

The AHW, at the same time, called on Marcos to appoint a DOH secretary who will protect health workers’ exercise of their free speech. They complained of being subjected to red-tagging which AHW members experienced even during the pandemic.

“We need a health secretary who can guarantee and will respect our constitutional right to self-organization, collective negotiations, peaceful concerted activities, security of tenure, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances,” AHW secretary-general Benjamin Santos said.

“We aspire to have a DOH Secretary who is determined to protect and defend the health workers against discrimination, intimidation, and violence including cases of red-tagging and killings. Violating our human rights is unjust as we are simply asking for better benefits, salary increase, and humane working conditions,” he added.

AHW has been at the forefront of calls for better conditions for health workers, especially after several doctors, nurses, and other hospital staff either got sick due to COVID-19 or died from the disease.

The group claimed several times that the government, instead of listening to them, had only labeled them as supporters or members of communist rebel groups.

READ: Health workers ask gov’t for relief from ‘agony’ of fighting COVID-19 surge

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

READ: Health workers ask PRC to revoke doctor’s license of Badoy 

KGA
TAGS: AHW, DoH, Pharmally, Philippine news updates

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.