Jinggoy Estrada: No plan yet to make me DAP witness | Inquirer News

Jinggoy Estrada: No plan yet to make me DAP witness

/ 01:26 PM September 18, 2017

Jinggoy Estrada

Former Sen. Jose Jinggoy Estrada waves from a van window with ink-stained fingers after undergoing process for release at the Sandiganbayan 5th Division Clerk of Court. INQUIRER PHOTO/LYN RILLON

Former senator Jinggoy Estrada on Monday said he was not yet approached by the administration to testify as witness in the case build-up involving the alleged misuse of Disbursement Acceleration Program (DAP) funds.

Estrada attended his scheduled plunder trial on Monday as a free man, after the Sandiganbayan allowed him to post a P1.33 million bail from plunder.

ADVERTISEMENT

READ: Jinggoy Estrada camp posts bail

FEATURED STORIES

In an interview after the hearing, Estrada said he has no knowledge yet about a reported plan of Justice Secretary Vitaliano Aguirre II to have him testify about the previous administration’s liability in the DAP anomaly.

“Wala akong alam doon. I haven’t heard of anything. Nobody has talked to me about it,” Estrada said.

He said his parents, former president now Manila mayor Joseph Estrada and mother former senator Loi Ejercito, are the happiest about his release from three years of detention.

He said that should he have been required to wait over the weekend to post his bail, he would have no problem with it, having come from being detained for three years at the Philippine National Police Custodial Center.

“Nakatiis ako ng tatlong taon. Tatlong araw lang (yun),” Estrada said.

READ: Is processing of Estrada bail on a Saturday normal?

ADVERTISEMENT

After receiving the favorable court resolution that granted his second bail plea, Estrada was allowed to post his P1.33 million bail on a Saturday at the Sandiganbayan.

Estrada’s plunder trial was cancelled Monday because of lack of quorum among the justices. It was reset to October 2.

READ: Jinggoy Estrada out on bail; Bong Revilla may be next

Estrada was allowed to post bail when the Sandiganbayan Special Fifth Division introduced the new doctrine brought about by the Supreme Court decision that dismissed the plunder case of former president Gloria Arroyo.

The anti-graft court said there is no strong evidence to show Estrada is the main plunderer, a jurisprudence set by the Arroyo case.

 

READ: No strong evidence Jinggoy is main plunderer – Sandigan | 2 Sandigan justices: Strong evidence to prove Estrada is ‘main plunderer’

Estrada first blew the lid on the alleged misuse of DAP funds, which were allegedly given as incentives to senators who voted to convict the late Chief Justice Renato Corona in the latter’s impeachment trial.

READ: What is Jinggoy Estrada’s advice to Aquino amid DAP controversy? 

The DAP, a savings impounding mechanism meant to boost the economy, implicated former president Benigno Aquino III for funds misuse.

But the Ombudsman cleared Aquino from liability and instead indicted his budget secretary Florencio “Butch” Abad for allegedly usurping the power of the purse of Congress in realigning the country’s savings under DAP. /je

READ: Abad indicted for usurpation of powers over DAP | Morales insists: No proof Aquino liable for DAP

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

RELATED VIDEO

TAGS: bail, case, DAP, Plunder, Witness

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.