Robredo: Pre-trial detention of up to 24 days violates the Constitution | Inquirer News

Robredo: Pre-trial detention of up to 24 days violates the Constitution

By: - Reporter / @KAguilarINQ
/ 10:26 AM June 25, 2020

MANILA, Philippines — Contrary to the stand of President Rodrigo Duterte, Vice President Leni Robredo believes that detention of up to 24 days without a warrant under the anti-terror bill is a violation of the Constitution.

The President sees no problem with the pre-trial detention of suspected terrorists under the proposed measure, Malacañang said Wednesday.

“Hindi lang ‘yan 14 days, it is even extendable to 10 days so 24 days na yun. And it’s against the Constitution,” Robredo said in an interview over ANC.

Article continues after this advertisement

(That’s not only 14 days, but it is also even extendable to 10 days so that’s 24 days. And it’s against the Constitution.)

FEATURED STORIES

“The Constitution specifically states that for a warrantless arrest, hanggang three days lang.

(The Constitution specifically states that for a warrantless arrest, it’s only up to three days.)

Article continues after this advertisement

Under Section 18, Article VII of the Constitution wherein it says that even when martial law is declared and that the privilege of the writ of habeas corpus is suspended, “any person thus arrested or detained shall be judicially charged within three days, otherwise, he shall be released.”

Article continues after this advertisement

“I am all our against terrorism. Pero yung sa akin, dalawang bagay kasi. There are very objectionable provisions in the anti-terror law. These provisions are objectionable because they are bound to be abused,” Robredo said.

Article continues after this advertisement

(I am all our against terrorism. But for me, there are two things. There are very objectionable provisions in the anti-terror law. These provisions are objectionable because they are bound to be abused.)

“Yung number two, the manner in which the anti-terror [bill] has been passed sa House of Representatives. Yung sakin, nagkakagulo na nga tayo dahil sa pandemic tapos nire-railroad pa yung pagpasa,” she went on.

Article continues after this advertisement

(Number two, the manner in which the anti-terror [bill] has been passed sa House of Representatives. For me, we are in chaos due to the pandemic and they railroaded how it was passed.)

Robredo said it would benefit all if more debates are to held and if the House of Representatives was open to amendments.

Earlier, Malacañang said the President is inclined to sign the anti-terror bill into law.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Meanwhile, the President himself said his legal team is still reviewing the proposed measure which has yet to arrive on his desk.

/MUF
TAGS: anti-terror bill, Leni Robredo, Malacañang, Palace, Rodrigo Duterte, Terrorism

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.