De Lima to House: Why allow ‘traditional courtesy’ in approving intel fund?

/ 03:32 PM September 11, 2019
De Lima to House: Why allow 'traditional courtesy' in approving intel fund?

Senator Leila de Lima. INQUIRER file photo

MANILA,Philippines — “Why is the House of Representatives allowing this so-called tradition of ‘courtesy’ to prevail over public scrutiny?”

Senator Leila de Lima raised this question on Wednesday following the House of appropriations committee’s approval of the proposed P4.5-billion budget for the Office of the President’s Confidential, Intelligence and Extraordinary (CIE) funds out of “traditional courtesy.”


READ: Office of the President’s P8.2 B 2020 budget gets swift House OK

“Where in the Constitution does it state that Congress cannot exercise its oversight function over the Intelligence Funds of the President?” De Lima said in a statement.


“Considering how bloated the budget is, all the more the President has to justify this amount,” she added.

The senator argued that legislators cannot simply justify the approval of a budget through “traditional courtesy,” adding that they have a responsibility to safeguard public interest against “abusive and anomalous” practices.

“We cannot just cite tradition on a whim that scrutinizing delicate funding, such as the CIE of the Office of the President, can be foregone, especially with the limiting accountability features for these budgets,” De Lima added.

Shadow of doubt

De Lima also noted that the proposed budget is “way too much for an office,” as she described it as “suspicious.”

“This is way too much for an office, which already has direct control over institutions that are mandated to gather information in relation to national security,” De Lima said.

“There is no sense for an executive office to ask for the highest confidential and intelligence funding than any other security and law enforcement agency in the government,” the senator further noted.


READ: Duterte wants intel, confidential funds almost doubled in 2020

Further, she questioned how the funds will be used by the Office of the President, claiming that “intel funds under President Duterte has only resulted in rubbish matrices, with the sole purpose of harassing or persecuting critics and dissenters.”

“The continuing attacks and fabricated accusations in the past three years against the opposition, myself included, casts a shadow of doubt on how the President would use this budget,” De Lima said.

De Lima then called the Congress to further scrutinise the hefty amount proposed by the President’s office.

“Kailangan manaig ang interes ng maayos na paggugol sa budget, lalo na at ang bilyong-bilyong nais ng Pangulo ay maaaring abusuhin,” De Lima said.

“The failure to have the President justify these budgets is also the failure to respond to the clamor for accountability from the people. National interest and public trust are at stake here,” she added. /jpv

Read Next
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.
View comments

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: De Lina, House, intelligence fund, Local news, Philippine news update, Senate
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.

© Copyright 1997-2020 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.