Article Index |Advertise | Mobile | RSS | Wireless | Newsletter | Archive | Corrections | Syndication | Contact us | About Us| Services
  Breaking News :    
Property Guide
Inquirer Mobile

Get the free INQUIRER newsletter
Enter your email address:

Inquirer Headlines / Nation Type Size: (+) (-)
You are here: Home > News > Inquirer Headlines > Nation

     Reprint this article     Print this article  
    Send Feedback  
    Post a comment   Share  



It’s come to this: Bishop calls RH backers terrorists

By Chona Yu, Jocelyn R. Uy, Christine O. Avendaño
Philippine Daily Inquirer, Radyo Inquirer
First Posted 03:18:00 04/27/2011

Filed Under: Churches (organisations), Family planning, Conflicts (general), Legislation, Religion & Belief

MANILA, Philippines?Advocates of the reproductive health (RH) bill are no better than terrorists because the measure could lead to the death of innocents, an official of the Catholic Bishops? Conference of the Philippines (CBCP) said Tuesday.

Cebu Archbishop Jose Palma, CBCP vice president, said condoms and abortion were tantamount to killing the innocent.

The Catholic Church, led by the CBCP, opposes the bill because it believes the measure will allow couples to gain easy access to condoms and other methods of contraception that can cause abortion.

Palma expressed dismay over lawmakers supporting the RH bill, which seeks to provide couples a choice of what family planning methods to use.

Reacting to reports that the bill was gaining adherents even from other religious groups, Palma said on Radyo Inquirer dzIQ: ?I hope that it is not true. If it is, we can only pray.?

?If people vote because of money then it?s almost like becoming Judas,? Palma said.

He said he wished the President would recall the ?walang mahirap, walang corrupt? campaign promise ?because threatening legislators that they will not receive their pork barrel if they will not support RH bill is a form of corruption.?

Malacañang has not issued any statement to the effect that the President would not release pork barrel to legislators against the bill.

President Benigno Aquino III has said he was against abortion but favored giving couples ?the right to choose how best to manage their families.?

Cebu Archbishop Emeritus Ricardo Cardinal Vidal said on Monday that it was futile for the Church to continue holding talks with Malacañang because the President had already made up his mind on the issue.

Consensus building needed

Sen. Gregorio Honasan II said the RH bill was ?too critical? an issue for the Church or any sector to give up on consensus-building dialogue.

He said a ?comprehensive national dialogue? among all sectors would guide both the House of Representatives and the Senate that would eventually vote on the legislation.

?I disagree with the good Cardinal Emeritus [Vidal]. We can?t give up on dialogue. If we presume that there is a stalemate and the positions have hardened, public interest will suffer,? he said in an interview.

Honasan observed that after the dialogue between the Church, Malacañang, Congress and other sectors stopped, they had resorted to ?media war.?

Not the enemy

Malacañang Tuesday said it was ?not the enemy? of the Church in the debate on the RH bill.

Presidential spokesperson Edwin Lacierda said Mr. Aquino wanted the government to serve as a ?referee? to those for and against it.

Lacierda said the Palace was ready to resume its dialogue with Catholic bishops despite Vidal?s call for the Church to back out from it.

?The Church should not look at the government as an adversary,? he said at a briefing.

He said the President was ?very open to a dialogue.?

Focus on common ground

Lacierda noted that in late March, Palace and Church officials agreed to resume their dialogue after the Holy week.

?Let?s focus on the common ground ... We?re not the enemy here. We?re trying to bring all the forces together and arrive at commonalities. And let?s agree to disagree on certain areas, but let?s explore our agreements more, and if it?s possible, put that in the bill,? he said.

He said that was the reason ?the President continues to believe in the dialogue with the Church as well as those who are pro-reproductive health bill.?

The Palace earlier initiated the dialogue with the Church in an effort to include its inputs in the bill that would see couples being given information on all family planning methods so they could have an informed decision when planning the size of their families.

After four meetings, the Church backed out and helped mount a protest rally last month to protest the RH bill.

Catholic bishops agreed to resume talks with the Palace upon Mr. Aquino?s invitation after the big anti-RH rally in Rizal Park in Manila.

Other Christian groups

While the Church is against the RH bill, other Christian groups like the Iglesia ni Cristo (INC) support it.

Lacierda said the Palace welcomed the move of other Christian groups to support the bill.

The INC, which endorsed Mr. Aquino during the May 2010 elections, said it was supporting modern methods of contraception ?as long as these methods are empirically [not] abortifacients.?

Unlike the Catholic Church, which promotes natural birth methods, the INC views them as ?ineffective? and ?immoral? since they counter ?the commandment that God has given to married couples.?

Protestant churches, including the National Council of Churches in the Philippines, United Church of Christ of the Philippines and the United Methodist Church, have also declared their support for the passage of the RH bill.

Avoid religious conflict

A priest said the Church would not argue with other religious groups promoting the measure to avoid religious conflict.

?The reproductive health bill is a moral issue so everybody has the right to speak on the matter regardless of religion,? said Fr. Melvin Castro, executive secretary of the CBCP?s Episcopal Commission on Family and Life, Tuesday.

He appealed to advocates of the bill to extend the Church the same treatment given to other Christian groups when it expresses its views on the bill.

?When the Catholic Church speaks against the measure, they invoke the separation of Church and State but when other churches speak in its favor, they don?t invoke it... let us be consistent about it because we are all stakeholders in this issue,? he said.
Former Sen. Francisco Tatad, a board member of a prolife group, International Right to Life Federation, warned against using the RH bill to promote religious conflict.

?There need not be any religious conflict arising from this,? Tatad said at the weekly forum hosted by the Catholic Media Network in Intramuros, Manila, Tuesday.

But he noted that the varying views on contraception held by the Catholic Church and other religious groups ?are real conflicts of positions.?

?But the Church is not asking the State to enforce its teaching on population. It is simply saying that ... if you pass the bill, you are trampling on the basic beliefs of Catholics,? Tatad said. With a report from TJ Burgonio

Copyright 2015 Philippine Daily Inquirer, Radyo Inquirer. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

To subscribe to the Philippine Daily Inquirer newspaper in the Philippines, call +63 2 896-6000 for Metro Manila and Metro Cebu or email your subscription request here.

Factual errors? Contact the Philippine Daily Inquirer's day desk.
Believe this article violates journalistic ethics? Contact the Inquirer's Reader's Advocate.
Or write The Readers' Advocate:

c/o Philippine Daily Inquirer
Chino Roces Avenue corner Yague and Mascardo Streets,
Makati City, Metro Manila, Philippines
Or fax nos. +63 2 8974793 to 94




  ^ Back to top

© Copyright 2001-2015 INQUIRER.net, An INQUIRER Company

Services: Advertise | Buy Content | Wireless | Newsletter | Low Graphics | Search / Archive | Article Index | Contact us
The INQUIRER Company: About the Inquirer | User Agreement | Link Policy | Privacy Policy

Philippine Fiesta
DZIQ 990