Dismissal of charges vs Espinosa, Lim, et al. ‘perplexing’ says Poe | Inquirer News

Dismissal of charges vs Espinosa, Lim, et al. ‘perplexing’ says Poe

/ 10:29 AM March 13, 2018

How a “self-confessed drug lord” like Kerwin Espinosa could be absolved by the State was “perplexing,” Senator Grace Poe lamented on Tuesday.

Poe said she was “disturbed” by the basis upon which the Department of Justice (DOJ) panel made its recommendation to dismiss the drug charges against Espinosa, noting that he himself admitted before a Senate inquiry that he was involved in the drug trade.

“How a self-confessed drug lord like Kerwin Espinosa can be exonerated by the State, is perplexing. It reflects the sloppiness of the police’s investigation and case build up against these drug lords,” the senator added.

Article continues after this advertisement

Cebu businessman and suspected drug triad boss Peter Lim, convicted drug lord Peter Co, Lovely Impal, Max Miro, Ruel Malindangan, Jun Pepito and several others had been  reportedly exonerated by the DOJ panel of prosecutors.

FEATURED STORIES

The panel, in a resolution reportedly issued on December 20, 2017, cited the weak evidence presented by the Criminal Investigation and Detection Group (CIDG) and the “inconsistencies” in the testimony of its lone witness, Marcelo Adorco, who was also cleared by them.

READ: DOJ clears suspected drug lord

Article continues after this advertisement

Poe pointed out that instead of absolving the respondents, Acting Prosecutor General Jorge Catalan’s claims that Adorco’s statements were  “self-serving and contradictory should have prompted them to use the entire machinery of the State’s prosecution arm to gather more testimonial and object evidence, rather than lazily relying on this single witness.”

Article continues after this advertisement

“Naghanap ba talaga ng ebidensya ang prosekyusyon?” she asked.

Article continues after this advertisement

If the DOJ panel decision was affirmed by the Secretary of Justice, Poe said this “would be an insult to the brave policemen who have died in legitimate anti-drug operations.”

 

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: Dismissal of case vs Espinosa, Lim puzzles PNP officer

In August 2017, the CIDG filed a case against the respondents for their alleged conspiracy to commit the “sale, trading, administration, dispensation, delivery, distribution and transportation of dangerous drugs and/or controlled precursors and essential chemicals.”

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

READ: WHAT WENT BEFORE: Who is Peter Lim?                /muf

TAGS: DoJ, drug lords, Drugs, Poe

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.