Ombudsman clears Aquino of homicide raps over Mamasapano tragedy
Former President Benigno Aquino III was cleared by the Office of the Ombudsman from homicide charges filed against him for his alleged reckless imprudence in the botched 2015 Mamasapano operation.
In a resolution obtained by the Inquirer, Ombudsman Conchita Carpio Morales said she is dismissing the reckless imprudence resulting in multiple homicide and physical injuries filed against Aquino for his alleged hand in the slay of the 44 Special Action Force (SAF) police officers, who were killed in a firefight during the anti-terror raid.
Also cleared along with Aquino are dismissed police chief Alan Purisima and sacked SAF commander Getulio Napeñas, who had been charged before the Sandiganbayan with graft and usurpation of powers for violating the police chain of command.
“In sum, no probable cause lies against respondents for reckless imprudence resulting in multiple homicide for the death of 44 SAF members, nor for reckless imprudence resulting in physical injuries for the wounding of 15 SAF troopers,” Morales said in her final resolution.
The Ombudsman however found probable cause to charge Aquino with graft and usurpation of authority in conspiracy with Purisima and Napeñas, for allowing Purisima to actively participate in the planning and implementation of the Oplan Exodus despite the latter’s graft suspension.
Morales said the deaths of the 44 elite policemen and the injuries afflicted on the 15 other members were the result of a firefight between government troops and the Bangsamoro Islamic Liberation Front (BIFF), the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF), and other private armed groups that ensued as the SAF men swooped down Mamasapano, Maguindanao and killed international terrorist Zulkifli bin Hir, alias Marwan.
Although Aquino was ordered charged for graft and usurpation of authority for allowing dismissed police chief Purisima to participate in the planning of “Oplan Exodus” despite his preventive suspension for a graft indictment, Aquino cannot be held liable for the deaths of the slain cops.
The Ombudsman said reckless imprudence resulting in multiple homicide and physical injuries can only be proven if there is a “direct causal connection” between the alleged negligence and the sustained injuries and damages.
At the least, reckless imprudence “must be the proximate cause of the collision,” the Ombudsman said.
But Morales said apparently the “proximate cause” of the deaths of the 44 slain SAF troops was the gunfire that erupted at the height of the botched anti-terror raid.
The “act of hostile forces” pertaining to the MILF, BIFF and other private armed groups was the “efficient intervening cause in the purported negligence of respondents during the planning, preparation, and actual implementation of Oplan Exodus,” Morales said.
The Ombudsman “hostile act” that caused the deaths of the SAF cops done by the MILF, BIFF and other private armed groups fall under “active external forces” that are outside the control of the respondents, and even if the SAF was able to coordinate with the military for reinforcement during the gunfire.
The Mamasapano operation was botched after Napeñas and Purisima failed to coordinate with the military for reinforcement before the launch of the raid, thus delaying the deployment of back-up troops and causing casualties.
This failure to coordinate with the military was the “efficient intervening cause” that only proved Purisima and Napeñas’ negligence in the planning, preparation and actual implementation of Oplan Exodus, the Ombudsman said.
“The proximate legal cause of the 44 deaths among the SAF members, as well as the wounding of its 15 troopers, remains to be the intentional act of shooting by the hostile forces, which are active external factors that may not necessarily be considered as within the full control of respondents, whether with a prior and timely coordination with government forces,” Morales said in her resolution.
“Such act constituted an efficient intervening cause in the purported negligence of Purisima and Napeñas during the planning, preparation and actual implementation of Oplan Exodus. An efficient intervening cause breaks the relation of cause and effect – the purported negligence and the resulting death or injury,’ she added.
The Ombudsman said while it found Purisima and Napeñas guilty of gross neglect of duty, it only pertained to their administrative offense, not criminal negligence.
“In other words, the purported negligence on the part of Purisima and Napeñas was still short of criminal negligence precisely because it was not the proximate legal cause,” Morales said.
Their negligence only contributed to the criminal negligence, the Ombudsman said, citing the time on target concept implemented by Purisima and Napeñas that was marred with the lack of proper coordination with the military for early deployment of reinforcement.
The Ombudsman earlier said that Napeñas’ adherence with the time on target (TOT) concept–or the concept of coordinating with the military only after the elite cops were in the target destination–resulted in heavy casualties because of the delay in coordination.
The TOT also caused Napeñas to bypass the police chain of command and commit usurpation of powers when he coordinated with a suspended police chief instead, Morales said.
Aquino may still file a motion for reconsideration on the Ombudsman’s indictment against him for usurpation of authority and graft.
Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.