Trial of Elenita Binay suspended | Inquirer News

Trial of Elenita Binay suspended

/ 04:50 AM November 23, 2016

Former Makati City Mayor Elenita Binay INQUIRER PHOTO / NINO JESUS ORBETA

Former Makati City Mayor Elenita Binay INQUIRER PHOTO / NINO JESUS ORBETA

Former Makati City Mayor Elenita Binay’s graft trial has been suspended after she asked Sandiganbayan Presiding Justice Amparo Cabotaje-Tang not to take part in the proceedings, questioning the judge’s impartiality.

The Sandiganbayan Third Division was to begin on Tuesday Binay’s trial on four consolidated graft and malversation cases, but Tang announced “all hearings scheduled for this case are suspended” until the former mayor’s Nov. 11 motion for inhibition of the top justice of the antigraft court is resolved.

Article continues after this advertisement

In seeking the inhibition, Binay told the court that Tang’s statements during the Oct. 13 hearing on her motion to reraffle the four cases to different divisions gave an “appearance of bias and prejudice” against the ex-mayor.

FEATURED STORIES

These cases arose from the allegedly overpriced procurement of P45-million worth of sterilizers and hospital beds for Ospital ng Makati from 2000 to 2001.

Binay’s lawyers said consolidating all four cases violated her rights because it created an impression of a “pattern” of irregularities, which amounted to a prejudgment. They added that raffling off the four cases to other divisions would avoid the impression of bias on the part of the Third Division.

Article continues after this advertisement

During the Oct. 13 hearing, Tang asked the defense panel if they were questioning the court’s impartiality.

Article continues after this advertisement

“If you are now saying that there should be appearance of impartiality, you are somehow casting aspersion on the impartiality of this court,” Tang told lawyer Grace Veronica Reyes then.

Article continues after this advertisement

This exchange prompted Binay’s lawyers to seek Tang’s inhibition because the judge “gave an impression that she was personally offended by the filing of the omnibus motion” to reraffle the four cases.

They said resolving their motion for inhibition “would put to rest all the apprehensions as to the personal inclinations of the Honorable Presiding Justice and would uproot vestiges of doubt on the impartial disposition of the cases” against Binay.

Article continues after this advertisement

Since 2011, Binay has won three cases in connection with alleged overpriced city hall furniture from 1999 to 2000 in three different divisions, the latest on Nov. 17 when she was acquitted by the Fourth Division.

She has another case also involving overpriced furniture pending before the Fifth Division.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS:

No tags found for this post.
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.