Purisima surrenders wearing shorts
Dismissed Philippine National Police (PNP) chief Alan Purisima on Friday “voluntarily surrendered” to the Sandiganbayan and was not arrested at the airport as earlier reported, his lawyer said.
In an ambush interview after Purisima posted a P30,000 bail for graft, Atty. Dexter Corpus said Purisima voluntarily surrendered to the Criminal Investigation and Detection Group (CIDG) upon arriving at the Ninoy Aquino International Airport (Naia) Terminal 3 around 2 p.m.
“Just to reiterate, he was not arrested, he voluntarily surrendered. That’s it,” Corpus said.
The CIDG served the arrest warrant against Purisima upon his arrival from Butuan City and brought him to the Sandiganbayan around 3 p.m.
Flanked by his police aides, Purisima wore shorts and rubber shoes in court for booking procedures.
Article continues after this advertisementSmiling at the cameras, Purisima refused to talk to the media.
Article continues after this advertisementREAD: Dismissed PNP chief Purisima arrested at Naia 3
Police arrested Purisima a day after the Sandiganbayan issued a warrant against him as he faces a graft charge for an anomalous courier deal in 2011.
Purisima paid the P30,000 bail bond for his provisional liberty.
In a resolution dated May 18, the anti-graft court Sixth Division said it found probable cause to try Purisima for graft and thus issued the arrest warrant.
“After judicious scrutiny and evaluation of the Information and resolution of the prosecutor, the evidence in support thereof and the records of the preliminary investigation attached thereto, the Court finds that sufficient grounds exist for the finding of a probable cause and for the issuance of a warrant of arrest against all the accused,” the court said.
The court thus rendered moot and academic Purisima’s motion to quash his graft charge and defer the arrest warrant.
READ: Purisima asks court to dismiss graft raps in courier deal
Purisima, an ally of President Benigno Aquino III, and 16 others were charged with one count of graft for acting allegedly with manifest partiality, evident bad faith and gross inexcusable negligence when they awarded the courier contract to the firm WerFast Documentary Agency, Inc.
The prosecution said Purisima violated Section 3(e) of the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act when he gave unwarranted benefit to Werfast.
Purisima entered into a memorandum of agreement (MOA) with Werfast and accredited the firm as the PNP’s courier service provider for all the firearms license applications despite its failure to comply with government regulations on courier services.
READ: Purisima faces graft over anomalous courier deal
Purisima and the respondents also approved the delivery by courier of firearms license as a mandatory policy in the PNP.
The prosecution said Werfast failed to seek prior registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and failed to get authority from the Department of Transportation and Communications to operate a delivery service as well as an accreditation from the Department of Science and Technology.
Also ordered arrested were retired Police Director Gil Meneses and dismissed Firearms and Explosives Office (FEO) officials Chief Supt. Napoleon Estilles, Senior Supt. Allan Parreño, Senior Supt. Melchor Reyes and Senior Inspector Ford Tuazon.
Werfast incorporators Mario Juan, Salud Bautista, Enrique Valerio, Lorna Perena and Juliana Pasia were also ordered arrested.
Salud is the president of Philrem Services Corp., the money remittance firm at the center of the alleged money laundering scheme in February, when $81 million was allegedly stolen by hackers in the Bangladesh Bank and stashed in the Philippines. Salud faces a money laundering complaint before the Department of Justice.
Since they have posted bail for provisional liberty, the court set on June 20 the arraignment of dismissed Police Chief Supt. Raul Petrasanta, a former official of Firearms and Explosives Office (FEO) and Central Luzon police director and the FEO officials Senior Supt. Eduardo Acierto, Supt. Lenbell Fabia, Chief Inspector Sonia Calixto, Chief Inspector Nelson Bautista and Chief Inspector Ricardo Zapata Jr.
As of Friday, all the accused have posted bail except Salud.
Graft is a criminal offense bailable upon the posting of a P30,000 bail bond for each count.
Earlier, the Office of the Ombudsman dismissed Purisima, Petrasanta and the others for the administrative offense of grave misconduct, serious dishonesty and grave abuse of authority. The officials were forfeited of their retirement benefits and barred from being reemployed in government.
READ: Purisima, Petrasanta, 9 other PNP officers dismissed from service
In ordering the graft charges, the Ombudsman said Purisima entered into a courier service contract with Werfast although the latter had no corporate existence and juridical personality when the PNP entered into a MOA in May 2011.
The Ombudsman found that no public bidding was conducted, and that the MOA was entered into although Werfast lacked the track record as a courier service company.
Purisima and the officials also admitted that the accreditation documents from Werfast were incomplete and met only the minimum requirements. The respondents also gave absolute credence to the company’s representative that it has a joint venture with CMIT Consultancy Group, Inc. and Philrem.
The Ombudsman’s investigation also showed that WerFast engaged the services of LBC that cost P190 for deliveries within Metro Manila and P290 outside, while the other courier service providers only charge P90 within Manila.
In her order, Ombudsman Conchita Carpio-Morales said “the document trail—from the execution of the MOA to the issuance of an accreditation policy, subsequent mandatory imposition of courier service fee deliveries, until accreditation of Werfast—reveals measures undertaken to mask a long line of violations.”
Purisima and the others stand accused of violating Section 3(e) of the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act, which prohibits public officials from causing any undue injury to any party, or giving any private party any unwarranted benefits, advantage or preference in the discharge of his official administrative or judicial functions through manifest partiality, evident bad faith or gross inexcusable negligence.
Petrasanta already faces a separate graft trial before the Sandiganbayan for the missing AK-47 assault rifles allegedly sold to communist rebels.
The Ombudsman also found probable cause to charge Purisima and sacked Special Action Force (SAF) commander Getulio Napeñas with graft and usurpation of powers for violating the police chain of command in the botched anti-terror raid “Oplan Exodus” that resulted in the deaths of 44 elite cops in Mamasapano, Maguindanao. RAM/rga
RELATED STORIES
