Purisima faces graft over anomalous courier deal
Resigned PNP chief Alan Purisima/INQUIRER FILE PHOTO/RAFFY LERMA
Dismissed Philippine National Police (PNP) chief Alan Purisima was formally charged before the Sandiganbayan with graft over an anomalous courier deal in 2011.
The charge sheet was submitted to the Sandiganbayan docket on Friday or hours after Ombudsman Conchita Carpio-Morales announced the filing of charges after she affirmed the criminal indictment.
READ: Ex-PNP chief Purisima to face graft charges over courier deal
According to the charge sheet, the Office of the Special Prosecutor charged Purisima, a friend of President Benigno Aquino III, with graft for acting with manifest partiality, evident bad faith and gross inexcusable negligence when he awarded the courier contract to an allegedly shady firm, WerFast Documentary Agency, Inc.
The prosecution said Purisima violated Section 3(e) of the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act when he gave unwarranted benefit to Werfast.
Purisima entered into a memorandum of agreement with Werfast and even accredited the firm as the PNP’s courier service provider for all the firearms license applications despite its failure to comply with government regulations on courier services.
Purisima and the respondents also approved the delivery by courier of firearms license as a mandatory policy in the PNP.
The prosecution said Werfast failed to seek prior registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and failed to get authority from the Department of Transportation and Communications to operate a delivery service as well as an accreditation from the Department of Science and Technology.
Also facing graft for conspiring with Purisima are the following officials: dismissed Police Chief Supt. Raul Petrasanta, a former official of Firearms and Explosives Office (FEO) and Central Luzon police director, retired Police Director Gil Meneses, and dismissed FEO officials Chief Superintendent Napoleon Estilles, Senior Superintendent Allan Parreño, Senior Supt. Eduardo Acierto, Senior Supt. Melchor Reyes, Supt. Lenbell Fabia, Chief Inspector Sonia Calixto, Chief Inspector Nelson Bautista, Chief Inspector Ricardo Zapata Jr., and Senior Inspector Ford Tuazon.
Also ordered charged are the Werfast incorporators such as Mario Juan, Salud Bautista, Enrique Valerio, Lorna Perena and Juliana Pasia.
Petrasanta had been eyed as the next police chief but the post later went to now Director General Ricardo Marquez.
Earlier, the Ombudsman dismissed Purisima, Petrasanta and the others for the administrative offense of grave misconduct, serious dishonesty and grave abuse of authority. The officials were thus forfeited their retirement benefits and barred from being reemployed in government.
READ: Purisima, Petrasanta, 9 other PNP officers dismissed from service
In ordering the graft charges, the Ombudsman said Purisima entered into a courier service contract with Werfast although the latter had no corporate existence and juridical personality when the PNP entered into a memorandum of agreement (MOA) in May 2011.
The Ombudsman found that no public bidding was conducted, and that the MOA was entered into although Werfast lacked the track record as a courier service company.
Purisima and the officials also admitted that the accreditation documents from Werfast were incomplete and met only the minimum requirements. The respondents also gave absolute credence to the company’s representative that it has a joint venture with CMIT Consultancy Group, Inc. and Philrem.
The Ombudsman’s investigation also showed that WerFast engaged the services of LBC that cost P190 for deliveries within Metro Manila and P290 outside, while the other courier service providers only charge P90 within Manila.
In her order, Morales said “the document trail—from the execution of the MOA to the issuance of an accreditation policy, subsequent mandatory imposition of courier service fee deliveries, until accreditation of WERFAST—reveals measures undertaken to mask a long line of violations.”
Purisima and the others stand accused of violating Section 3(e) of the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act, which prohibits public officials from causing any undue injury to any party, or giving any private party any unwarranted benefits, advantage or preference in the discharge of his official administrative or judicial functions through manifest partiality, evident bad faith or gross inexcusable negligence.
Petrasanta already faces a separate graft trial before the Sandiganbayan over the missing AK-47 assault rifles allegedly sold to communist rebels.
READ: Aquino’s pal Petrasanta, cops face arrest over AK-47 deal
The Ombudsman had also found probable cause to charge Purisima and sacked Special Action Force (SAF) commander Getulio Napeñas with graft and usurpation of powers for violating the police chain of command in the botched anti-terror raid “Oplan Exodus” that resulted in the deaths of 44 elite cops in Mamasapano, Maguindanao. RAM/rga
READ: Ombudsman: Napeñas, Purisima liable for Mamasapano carnage
