Disqualified Marinduque solon questions SC ruling on Poe case | Inquirer News

Disqualified Marinduque solon questions SC ruling on Poe case

/ 07:53 PM March 27, 2016

The House of Representatives is still mulling what to do with Marinduque Rep. Regina Reyes (shown in photo) after the Supreme Court upheld with finality her disqualification from the 2013 election for failing to renounce her American citizenship. INQUIRER.net file photo

Disqualified Marinduque Rep. Regina Reyes. INQUIRER.net file photo

Unseated Marinduque Representative Regina Ongsiako-Reyes on Sunday questioned the Supreme Court’s decision allowing Senator Grace Poe to run for President despite questions in her citizenship and residency.

Reyes was earlier disqualified by the Commission on Elections (Comelec) in the 2013 congressional election on the grounds that she was a naturalized American citizen.

Article continues after this advertisement

The poll body’s decision was affirmed by the House of Representatives Electoral Tribunal (HRET). The same ruling was affirmed by the Supreme Court and has already attained finality.

FEATURED STORIES

Reyes compared the high court’s ruling on Poe’s case and that of the disqualification case against her.

She said the high court allowed Poe to run for president even if her parents are unknown while declaring her as ineligible for a congressional seat when she is “a natural-born citizen, with a birth certificate, whose parents are Filipino citizens and are known public servants.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Reyes asked why the high court allowed a foundling who reacquired Philippine citizenship, like Poe did, to seek presidency after earlier disqualifying a natural-born candidate in lower elective posts with previous dual citizenship and known parents, like Reyes does.

Article continues after this advertisement

“If Poe-Llamanzares is allowed to run, should not, with more reason, that Gina O. Reyes be allowed to run?” Reyes said in a statement.

Article continues after this advertisement

Associate Justice Mariano del Castillo has warned in his dissenting opinion that the controversial SC ruling on Poe’s case would open the floodgates of election protests as it reversed the jurisprudence set in earlier poll cases.

Barely two weeks after the March 8 Poe ruling, Reyes is the first poll protester to come forward and invoke the controversial ruling to insist on her own eligibility as congresswoman of her province’s lone district.

Article continues after this advertisement

Reyes said the two fresh election protests filed against her by Lord Allan Jay Velasco before the Commission on Elections should be dismissed because the high court has just ruled in the Poe case that the poll body has no jurisdiction to decide on the qualifications of a president, vice president, senators, and congressmen.

Reyes quoted the SC as ruling in the Poe case that under Article VI, Section 7 and Article VII, Section 4 of the 1987 Constitution, candidates for president, vice president, senator, and congressman “have first to run before the Presidential Electoral Tribunal, Senate Electoral Tribunal, and the House of Representatives Electoral Tribunal can pass upon their eligibility/qualifications.”

Comparing herself with Poe, Reyes said that she too executed an affidavit of renouncing her foreign citizenship, not once but twice, on September 21, 2012, and on September 21, 2015.

The unseated congresswoman said these affidavits of renunciation restored her status as a natural-born Filipino citizen. JE

RELATED STORIES

SC says it’s final: Marinduque solon is DQ’d

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

SC dismisses House’s bid to reconsider its decision removing Marinduque lawmaker

TAGS: citizenship, decision, disqualification, disqualified, Grace Poe, Poe, ruling, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.