DOJ dismisses cyberlibel raps vs Makabayan bloc personalities | Inquirer News

DOJ dismisses cyberlibel raps vs Makabayan bloc personalities

/ 04:53 PM September 06, 2022

For lack of probable cause, the Department of Justice (DOJ) dismissed the cyber libel complaint filed by the Philippine National Police-Criminal Investigation and Detection Group (PNP-CIDG) against current and former members of the Makabayan bloc.

In this file photo, Reps. Arlene Brosas, Carlos Isagani Zarate, Sarah Jane Elago, France Castro and Ariel Casilao face the media in Makabayan bloc’s regular press briefing. INQUIRER file photo

MANILA, Philippines — For lack of probable cause, the Department of Justice (DOJ) dismissed the cyber libel complaint filed by the Philippine National Police-Criminal Investigation and Detection Group (PNP-CIDG) against current and former members of the Makabayan bloc.

In a resolution made public Tuesday, the DOJ dismissed the complaint against Gabriela Rep. Arlene Brosas, former Bayan Muna Rep. Carlos Zarate, and former Gabriela Reps. Luzviminda Calolot-Ilagan and Liza Maza.

Article continues after this advertisement

The PNP-CIDG filed the complaint following the publication of statements from the progressive group accusing them of planting evidence during the arrest of a certain Lourdes “Simang” Bulan for two counts of murder.

FEATURED STORIES

The police recovered firearms, explosives, tarpaulins, and Bayan Muna and Gabriela flyers and presented them to the public.

On Nov. 17, 2021, a story was published where Zarate had described the seizing of such evidence as a “dirty tactic of the National Task Force to End Local Communist Armed Conflict to align the Makabayan bloc and its members like his party and the Gabriela Women’s Party with the rebels.”

Article continues after this advertisement

The following day, Gabriela was quoted as saying “These red-tagging gimmicks, while not new, seek to place the lives and safety of our members and leaders on the line.”

Article continues after this advertisement

The PNP-CIDG claimed that the Makabayan members issued false statements made to destroy and malign the reputation of the PNP to the public.

Article continues after this advertisement

But the DOJ said for one to be charged with cyber libel, the person should either be the author or creator of the post, editor, or business manager if published.

The DOJ said: “It bears stressing that Rep. Zarate, Rep. Brosas, Ms. Ilagan, and Ms. Maza are neither the author nor the person who created such post.” the resolution said. “Respondents likewise did not publish, exhibit, or cause the publication of the articles in news question.”

Article continues after this advertisement

“While respondents or the organizations they represent were alluded to in the articles, there was no sufficient allegation that they caused the online publication of their statements,” it added, noting that this demonstrated a lack of probable cause to indict the respondents for the offense charged.

RELATED STORIES:

Makabayan bloc: Anti-communist task force targeting unions 

5 NPA members nabbed in Bulacan, say cops

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Red-tagging puts lives in danger, file cases instead, Guevarra says

JPV/abc
TAGS: cyberlibel, DoJ, PNP‎, red-tagging

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.