SC asked to stop no-contact apprehension policy | Inquirer News

SC asked to stop no-contact apprehension policy

/ 04:55 AM August 16, 2022

EDSA traffic. STORY: SC asked to stop no-contact apprehension policy

The Metropolitan Manila Development Authority resumed the number coding scheme on Metro Manila roads beginning Aug. 15, 2022, in anticipation of the return of face-to-face classes. (Photo by JONATHAN VICENTE / INQUIRER.net) 

MANILA, Philippines — Four transport groups have asked the Supreme Court to issue an injunction against the no-contact apprehension policy (NCAP) implemented by five cities in Metro Manila.

In a 47-page petition, they asked the high tribunal to declare as unconstitutional the program that uses closed-circuit television systems and digital cameras to catch motorists in the act of committing traffic violations.

Article continues after this advertisement

They argued in their petition that motorists were “under constant threat of being arbitrarily apprehended remotely and issued notices of violation for alleged traffic offenses committed without any contact whatsoever.”

FEATURED STORIES

The petitioners were Kilusan sa Pagbabago ng Industriya ng Transportasyon Inc., Pasang Masda, Alliance of Concerted Transport Organizations and Altodap.

But the mayors of Parañaque, Valenzuela, Quezon City, Manila, and Muntinlupa where the NCAP was being implemented, stood by NCAP, saying it has helped them improve traffic conditions and reduce corruption among enforcers.

Article continues after this advertisement

Valenzuela Mayor Wes Gatchalian told the Inquirer that without a court order, they fully intended to continue the program while also studying how to craft uniform guidelines to improve its implementation.

Article continues after this advertisement

Land Transportation Office chief Teofilo Guadiz III, meanwhile, called on the mayors to sit down with the agency and the Metropolitan Manila Development Authority to come up with a standard set of guidelines favorable to their cities, motorists, and agencies implementing the policy.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Once well-defined guidelines are drafted, this can perhaps be emulated by other cities who may want to implement their own NCAP,” Guadiz said.

—KRIXIA SUBINGSUBING

RELATED STORIES

Article continues after this advertisement

MMDA respects LGU autonomy on ‘no contact apprehension policy’

LTO urges LGUs to suspend ‘no contact apprehension policy’

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.