Independent review urges updates to FAA risk reports after Boeing 737 MAX crashes | Inquirer News
Close  

Independent review urges updates to FAA risk reports after Boeing 737 MAX crashes

/ 11:15 AM June 23, 2022
Independent review urges updates to FAA risk reports after Boeing 737 MAX crashes

An aerial view of a Boeing 737 MAX airplane parked at King County International Airport-Boeing Field in Seattle, Washington, U.S, June 1, 2022. REUTERS

WASHINGTON — A National Academy of Sciences report released Wednesday recommended the U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) make a series of improvements to its airplane risk assessment reports after two Boeing 737 MAX crashes.

The report was ordered by Congress in 2020 after questions emerged about a risk assessment report drafted by the FAA after the first of two fatal MAX crashes.

ADVERTISEMENT

The evaluation report Wednesday makes a number of recommendations to the FAA to improve its risk assessment report process, known formally as the Transport Airplane Risk Assessment Methodology (TARAM), including improving systematic risk modeling.

An FAA spokesman said the agency welcomes “outside scrutiny and are carefully reviewing the report.” Boeing declined to comment on the report.

FEATURED STORIES

House of Representatives Transportation Committee Chair Peter DeFazio said on Wednesday in a statement that the evaluation report ordered by Congress as part its overhaul of the FAA’s aircraft certification program “makes it very clear that the FAA can better fulfill its responsibility to effectively and consistently collect and use data to advance passenger safety.”

In the aftermath of the October 2018 Lion Air 737 MAX crash, the first of the two crashes, the FAA conducted a risk assessment that calculated that without a fix to a key safety system called MCAS there would be an estimated 15 additional fatal accidents over the lifetime of the 737 MAX.

DeFazio in 2019 said, “Despite its own calculations, the FAA rolled the dice on the safety of the traveling public and let the MAX continue to fly until Boeing could overhaul its MCAS software.” He noted the TARAM “never saw the light of day beyond the closed doors of the FAA and Boeing.”

The TARAM is used by the FAA “for calculating a numerical value for risk associated with transport airplanes whenever continued operational safety issues occur,” Wednesday’s report said.

The report said it is critical that senior FAA leaders understand the “results from the analysis of a potential unsafe condition that has significant consequences for transport category airplanes.”

The report also calls for improvements to TARAM data inputs and the assessment process, and noted the FAA has “only one recognized subject-matter expert” for the TARAM and should designate multiple employees as experts.

The best-selling 737 MAX was grounded in March 2019 after the two crashes, which occurred in a span of five months and killed 346 people. The FAA approved the jet’s return to service after significant safety enhancements — including new safeguards to MCAS — developed during the plane’s 20-month grounding.

ADVERTISEMENT

RELATED STORIES

Boeing papers show employees slid 737 Max problems past FAA

Boeing wants it to fly, but travelers fear the 737 MAX

Families of crash victims want U.S. to rescind approval for Boeing 737 MAX to fly again

Boeing facing serious consequences over 737 MAX

Read Next
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: Aviation, Boeing 737 MAX, FAA, Plane crash
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.


© Copyright 1997-2022 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.