Roque to PhilHealth chief: Face and address damaging issues | Inquirer News

Roque to PhilHealth chief: Face and address damaging issues

By: - Reporter / @KAguilarINQ
/ 01:04 PM June 19, 2020

palace roque malacanang

Presidential Spokesperson Harry Roque. FILE PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines — Presidential spokesperson Harry Roque on Friday slammed Philippine Health Insurance Corporation (PhilHealth) chief Ricardo Morales for diverting attention from his  supposed failure to rid the agency of irregularities.

“The remarks of Philippine Health Insurance Corporation (Philhealth) President and Chief Executive Officer Ricardo Morales are yet another attempt to divert attention from a damaging issue, which is that the Philhealth head has failed to clean up the agency, which was the mandate given to him by President Rodrigo Roa Duterte,” Roque said in a statement.

Article continues after this advertisement

Morales earlier said there is no problem with him if he is replaced as PhilHealth chief while noting that Roque was “not President” but a “spokesman.”

FEATURED STORIES

Roque earlier said  that it may be better to find someone else to enforce the Universal Health Care Law since it is unlawful to delay its implementation.

Morales earlier sought for the delay of the program’s rollout ,citing PhilHealth’s declining revenue amid the COVID-19 pandemic.

Article continues after this advertisement

“This is not about me being the presidential spokesperson. This is about President Duterte’s appointing Mr. Morales to fix the organization and eliminate corruption,” Roque said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Last year, the President ordered the entire PhilHealth board at the time to resign after the alleged irregularities were discovered. It was Morales who replaced then PhilHealth chief Roy Ferrer.

Article continues after this advertisement

Go to court? 

Recently, Roque had questioned Morales’ alleged inaction on the corruption within the agency, even asking if that latter had removed any official.

Article continues after this advertisement

But Morales advised Roque to file cases in court if he has evidence of corruption within PhilHealth.

“Mr. Morales has the wrong view that only the courts can remove scoundrels in Philhealth; when in truth, he has administrative powers to suspend and remove them,” Roque said.

“A case in point was when Mr. Morales took the advice from his counsels to withhold official documents in relation to the WellMed ghost dialysis scam. The National Privacy Commission had to opine what any person should know: That internet privacy is not a shield from investigation for graft and corruption,” he further said.

Last year, Roque said he was denied access to PhilHealth documents that would serve as evidence against the agency’s officials involved in the alleged fictitious dialysis services and fake receipts issued to workers, among other irregularities.

Morales, at the time, said Roque was not entitled to the documents since he was no longer working for the government. Roque only returned as Palace spokesman in April 2020, over a year since he stepped down to make way for his senatorial bid.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

“Mr. Morales once said, I will make it a point that our members will renew their trust on PhilHealth.’ I enjoin cavalier Morales to engage in self-examination whether he has made our people trust PhilHealth and whether his continued service in the agency would be a service to this nation which we both love so dearly, or whether his talents can be better utilized elsewhere,” Roque said.

gsg
TAGS: Harry Roque, Palace, Philhealth

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.