Del Rosario: Aquino admin did all ‘necessary, possible means’ on sea row |
SOUTH CHINA SEA DISPUTE

Del Rosario: Aquino admin did all ‘necessary, possible means’ on sea row

By: - Reporter / @DYGalvezINQ
/ 02:26 PM April 02, 2019

albert-del-rosario

Former Foreign Secretary Albert del Rosario. INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines — Former Foreign Affairs Secretary Albert del Rosario on Tuesday asserted that the administration of President Benigno S. Aquino III did everything it can to achieve “a peaceful conclusion” to the South China Sea dispute.

Del Rosario said the Aquino administration undertook “more bilateral consultations with (China) than any other administration” and “protested more times than anybody else.”

Article continues after this advertisement

The ex-top diplomat of the government rejected allegations that the Aquino administration’s negligence led to China’s aggressive building of artificial islands in the disputed waters.

FEATURED STORIES

“We undertook the necessary, every possible means to come to a peaceful conclusion to this problem,” Del Rosario said in an interview over ABS-CBN News Channel when told that some groups accuse the Aquino administration of not acting enough to prevent China’s building of structures in the West Philippine Sea.

“We wanted a durable peaceful solution to emanate from this. It did not happen,” he added.

Article continues after this advertisement

Del Rosario underscored China’s “very clear expansion agenda” that was based on its “unlawful premise” that it had sovereignty over the entire South China Sea.

Article continues after this advertisement

China’s strategy, he noted, involved “salami slicing” wherein it did things “slowly and illegally so that nobody notices and if they notice, it’s not an infraction big enough for anybody to get excited about.”

Article continues after this advertisement

This approach, he also said, enabled China to seize control over contested areas in the South China Sea.

Del Rosario said that when the Aquino administration noticed this shady salami slicing scheme, they immediately called for bilateral talks with China.

Article continues after this advertisement

“We engaged in bilateral consultations and the records would show that we have had more bilateral consultations with them than any other administration,” he said.

“We also noted that we protested more times than anybody else in out of these bilaterals,” he also said.

When the numerous bilateral talks apparently failed, Del Rosario said the Aquino administration had no choice but to put together a “legal track,” causing the Philippines’ filing of a complaint against China before the Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) in The Hague, Netherlands.

PCA is an intergovernmental organization providing a variety of dispute resolution between states.

The Philippines questioned the legality of China’s “nine-dash line,” which virtually covers most of the South China Sea, including areas that other Asian nations also claim.

In 2016, the arbitral tribunal ruled in favor of the Philippines. It invalidated China’s nine-dash line and affirmed the Philippines exclusive sovereign rights over the West Philippine Sea (in the South China Sea). /kga

RELATED STORIES

PH wins arbitration case over South China Sea

China slams PH over South China Sea case

Aquino says he worked hard to fight China’s incursion into West PH Sea

UNCLOS explained: Why China’s claims in South China Sea are invalid

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

The heart of the dispute over the West PH Sea

TAGS: China, Local news, Nation, national news, News, Noynoy Aquino

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.