House justice panel dismisses impeach raps vs 7 SC justices | Inquirer News

House justice panel dismisses impeach raps vs 7 SC justices

/ 11:15 AM September 25, 2018

In less than 10 minutes, the House of Representatives justice panel unanimously approved on Tuesday the committee report dismissing the impeachment complaints against Chief Justice Teresita Leonardo-De Castro and six other Supreme Court (SC) justices who ousted Maria Lourdes Sereno as the top magistrate.

With a vote of 22-0, the impeachment cases against the high tribunal’s magistrates are now officially dismissed.

The committee earlier found the complaints as sufficient in form but insufficient in substance thereby junking the consolidated complaints lodged against De Castro, Associate Justices Lucas Bersamin, Francis Jardeleza, Andres Reyes Jr., Alexander Gesmundo, and Noel Tijam.

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: Impeach cases vs SC justices ‘sufficient in form’ | House justice panel junks impeach cases vs 7 anti-Sereno SC justices

FEATURED STORIES

The panel will then transmit the report to the plenary for its approval, committee chair and Oriental Mindoro 1st District Rep. Salvador “Doy” Leachon said.

Reps. Edcel Lagman, Gary Alejano and Teddy Baguilat, Jr. had accused the seven of committing culpable violations of the Constitution based on two grounds:

Article continues after this advertisement

– Knowingly and maliciously defying the constitutional mandate that high officials of the government, like the Chief Justice, can only be removed from office solely by impeachment; and

Article continues after this advertisement

– Arrogating the sole power of the Judicial and Bar Council to vet the qualifications of applicants to the judiciary and nominate in a shortlist the candidates qualified for appointment in the judiciary.

Article continues after this advertisement

Meanwhile, Lagman, Alejano and Baguilat had accused De Castro, Peralta, Bersamin, Jardeleza, and Tijam of committing betrayal of public trust when they refused to inhibit themselves from participating in the adjudication of the quo warranto petition “despite their continuing ill will, bias and prejudice against Sereno.”  /muf

RELATED STORIES:

Article continues after this advertisement

SC justices who ousted Sereno face impeachment complaints 

Opposition solons file impeachment raps vs 7 Supreme Court justices

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

LOOK: Impeach complaints vs anti-Sereno SC associate justices

TAGS: dismissal

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.