Impeach cases vs SC justices ‘sufficient in form’ | Inquirer News

Impeach cases vs SC justices ‘sufficient in form’

/ 10:59 AM September 04, 2018

Members of the House justice committee discuss the impeachment complaints filed against seven Supreme Court justices who voted in favor of the quo warranto pleading against Maria Lourdes Sereno. INQUIRER.NET / NOY MORCOSO

The House of Representatives committee on justice ruled on Tuesday that the impeachment complaints against Chief Justice Teresita Leonardo-De Castro and six other anti-Sereno justices were sufficient in form.

Misamis Occidental 2nd District Henry Oaminal made the motion. Twenty-one members of the committee were in favor of the motion. No one objected.

Article continues after this advertisement

Sufficiency in form is determined principally by finding whether the impeachment complaint is verified or not.

FEATURED STORIES

The committee now has to determine if the complaints are sufficient in substance before it could proceed in discussing whether the complaints have probable cause.

The panel suspended its consideration of the complaints’ sufficiency in substance to give more time for other members to read the seven impeachment complaints. The next hearing will be on Sept. 11.

Article continues after this advertisement

Villarin not a complainant  

Article continues after this advertisement

Akbayan Rep. Tom Villarin’s motion to be recognized as one of the complainants was also rejected by the committee chair,Oriental Mindoro 1st District Rep. Salvador “Doy” Leachon despite some objections from other panel members.

Article continues after this advertisement

Leachon said this would be a violation of the rules because Villarin failed to sign the verified complaints when Albay 1st District Rep. Edcel Lagman, Magdalo Rep. Gary Alejano and Ifugao Rep. Teddy Baguilat filed them on Aug. 23.

READ: SC justices who ousted Sereno face impeachment complaints  / Opposition solons file impeachment raps vs 7 Supreme Court justices

Article continues after this advertisement

LOOK: Impeach complaints vs anti-Sereno SC associate justices

Siquijor Rep. Ramon Rocamora supported Villarin’s request, as he feared that the public might give a perception that the committee was “trying to muffle the truth.” But Leachon refused to accept this.

 

Complaints consolidated

Ako Bicol Rep. Alfredo Garbin, Jr. motioned that the panel consolidate the seven impeachment complaints. The panel approved it with the concurrence of the complainants.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

The next hearing will be on Sept. 11. /cbb/muf

TAGS: House of Representatives, Impeachment, News, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.