JBC should answer why Sereno qualified as chief justice, says Aquino | Inquirer News

JBC should answer why Sereno qualified as chief justice, says Aquino

/ 04:09 PM February 26, 2018

Aquino

Former President Benigno Aquino III faces the media after attending a House inquiry on the controversial Dengvaxia vaccine program. Julliane Love de Jesus/INQUIRER.net

“Ano ba talaga (What is it really)?”

A confused former President Benigno Aquino III said this as he stressed that it should not be him but the Judicial and Bar Council (JBC) who should explain why Chief Justice Maria Lourdes qualified for the post despite her failure to submit complete statement of assets, liabilities and net worth (SALN).

Article continues after this advertisement

“Sila (JBC) dapat sumagot no’n dahil kapag binigay sa akin ang listahan, ibig sabihin qualified sila (chief justices nominees),” Aquino told reporters on Monday.

FEATURED STORIES

(They should be the ones to answer that because when they gave me the list, being on the list means they’re qualified as chief justices nominees.)

“Mahirap no, mabibigay sa ‘yo: ‘Ito listahan ng mga taong qualified.’ Pagpili mo, ‘Oo nga pala hindi ‘yan qualified.’ Ano ba talaga?”

Article continues after this advertisement

(It’s difficult when they give it to you, saying, ‘This is the list of people qualified.’ And then when you choose, they say, ‘Oh by the way they aren’t qualified. What is it really?)

Article continues after this advertisement

The case was filed before the Office of the Ombudsman while Aquino was at the House inquiry on the controversial dengue vaccine program that led to the deaths of some Filipinos.

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: Suspended lawyer files graft vs ex-Pres. Aquino, Sereno, JBC execs at Ombudsman

Atty. Eligio Mallari, a lawyer who was previously suspended over an issue with Government Service Insurance System (GSIS), accused Aquino, Sereno and some officials of violating the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act for the appointment of Sereno as Chief Justice in 2012.

Article continues after this advertisement

Mallari accused Aquino and other respondents gave “unwarranted benefits, advantage or preference to Sereno through manifest partiality, evident bad faith or gross inexcusable negligence, in violation of Section 3(e) of RA 3019.”

During Sereno’s application for the CJ post in 2012, she wrote a letter to JBC asking for exemption from SALN submission as her SALN, particularly her records when she was still a University of the Philippines (UP) law professor, could no longer be located.

This was not, however, brought up before the JBC en banc.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

But Sereno’s camp said she submitted three SALNs since her appointment as SC Associate Justice in 2010. /je

TAGS: graft case, JBC, qualified, Sereno

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.