Solon: Duterte could have done more to get Lopez confirmed | Inquirer News

Solon: Duterte could have done more to get Lopez confirmed

/ 05:20 PM May 04, 2017

Gina Lopez

Former Environment Secretary Gina Lopez (File photo by JILSON SECKLER TIU / Philippine Daily Inquirer)

Makabayan representatives on Thursday said President Rodrigo Duterte failed to give enough support to beleaguered Gina Lopez who was rejected by the Commission on Appointments (CA) as environment secretary.

In a news conference at the House of Representatives, Act Teachers Rep. Antonio Tinio said Duterte’s support for Lopez did not translate to CA support for her, even though the commission is dominated by the president’s allies.

Article continues after this advertisement

Lopez has gained support even from the leftists for her anti-destructive mining stance.

FEATURED STORIES
READ: CA rejects Gina Lopez’ appointment

“Malinaw na yung public support ni Pangulong Duterte kay Gina Lopez, pero in the end, her fate was left to the members of the CA,” Tinio said.

(“The public support of President Duterte for Gina Lopez is clear. But in the end, her fate was left to the members of the CA.”)

Article continues after this advertisement

Anakpawis Rep. Ariel Casilao said the President’s support for Lopez was “unquestionable,” but Duterte may have failed to provide enough support to convince the CA members to confirm Lopez’s appointment.

Article continues after this advertisement
READ: Solons on CA’s rejection of Lopez: Sad day for the environment

“As to the question whether kung ginawa ba talaga ni Pangulong Duterte ang lahat, may kakulangan. Malinaw yun. Kung tingin niya talaga na karapat dapat si Gina, mayroon pa siyang magagawa more than the public pronouncements to convince the CA members to vote in her favor,” Casilao said.

Article continues after this advertisement

(“As to the question whether President Duterte really gave it his all, there is something remiss. That’s clear. If he really thinks Gina is deserving, he could have done more than the public pronouncements to convince the CA members to vote in her favor.”)

READ: Duterte appeals to CA for Gina Lopez’ confirmation

Tinio said Lopez’s rejection by the CA was due to the lawmakers’ mining interests. Lopez has led the shut down of mining firms due to destructive mining.

Article continues after this advertisement

“I think it’s very clear that mining interests are directly represented (in the CA)… Hindi nakakagulat that the House contingent unanimously voted to reject Gina Lopez. In other words, nagwagi yung mining interests,” Tinio said.

(“It’s not surprising anymore that the House contingent unanimously voted to reject Gina Lopez. In other words, mining interests won the day.”)

Casilao said despite Lopez’s rejection, her stint in the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) challenged the influential mining sector.

READ: Duterte stands by Lopez even if gov’t risks losing mining revenue

“Secretary Lopez challenged the powers that be. Despite the support of the President, it really challenged the very influential sector in our society,” Casilao said.

In a news conference after her rejection on Wednesday, Lopez blamed the big business interests in government for her beeing booted out of the DENR.

Before Lopez was rejected by the CA, Duterte reappointed Lopez after the latter was bypassed before Congress went on a six-week break last March 15. /atm

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

RELATED STORIES

Gina on CA rejection: It’s sad that business interests run the day
Duterte reappoints Gina Lopez, 3 other bypassed secretaries
CA bypasses Lopez, 3 other secretaries
Lopez: Duterte is ‘the real thing;’ he ‘deeeeeply cares’ for PH
TAGS: DENR chief, Gina Lopez

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.