Anger in UK over Prince Andrew's '£12 million' settlement | Inquirer News

Anger in UK over Prince Andrew’s ‘£12 million’ settlement

/ 11:47 AM February 17, 2022

Anger in UK over Prince Andrew's '£12 million' settlement

(FILES) In this file photo taken on January 12, 2022 (COMBO) This combination of pictures shows Britain’s Prince Andrew, Duke of York, on April 11, 2021 in Windsor, England and Virginia Giuffre on October 22, 2019 in New York City. – Prince Andrew and his accuser Virginia Giuffre have settled a sexual assault lawsuit, according to a court filing February 15, 2022. (Photo by Steve Parsons and Ben Gabbe / various sources / AFP)

LONDON — Disgraced British royal Prince Andrew was urged Wednesday to disappear forever from public life after settling a sexual assault lawsuit at vast cost, as Queen Elizabeth II suffered further indignity in her Platinum Jubilee year.

The 95-year-old monarch, who is reportedly helping to foot the bill for the cash-strapped Andrew’s settlement, also saw her elder son and heir Prince Charles embroiled in fresh controversy over a “cash for honors” scandal.

Article continues after this advertisement

Police in London said they were investigating claims that an aide to Charles offered UK honors and even citizenship to a Saudi tycoon, in return for donations to Charles’s charitable foundation.

FEATURED STORIES

The office of the Prince of Wales reiterated that he “had no knowledge of the alleged offer” by Michael Fawcett, who for decades was one of Charles’s closest confidants.

The revelation came a day after Charles’s younger brother Andrew settled the lawsuit brought by US accuser Virginia Giuffre, sparing him the public humiliation of a trial.

Article continues after this advertisement

Details of the deal were not made public, and Andrew’s representatives told AFP they would not comment on the contents.

Article continues after this advertisement

The Daily Telegraph put the settlement at a whopping £12 million ($16.3 million, 14.3 million euros) — £10 million for Giuffre and £2 million to a charity for victims of sex trafficking.

Article continues after this advertisement

The newspaper said the money would come from one of the private estates belonging to Queen Elizabeth. Commentators demanded transparency on the source, in case the British taxpayer ends up on the hook.

‘Swept under the carpet’

“I just think it’s awful that it’s all been swept under the carpet, as if it never even happened,” Yasmine Ollive, a 34-year-old account manager, said in London.

Article continues after this advertisement

After other controversies over Prince Harry and his wife Meghan Markle, she said that if the royals “keep on carrying on with the things that they’re doing, then it could be the end of them”.

Giuffre, 38, has said she had sex with Andrew when she was 17 and a minor under US law, after meeting him through US financier Jeffrey Epstein. He took his own life in prison while awaiting trial for sex crimes.

The prince, 61, has not been criminally charged and has denied the allegations.

Mark Stephens, a media specialist at law firm Howard Kennedy, told AFP that Andrew had “preserved some measure of dignity for the wider royal family” by agreeing to settle.

But, Stephens added, “he’s not going to see the light of day in public service ever again”.

The scandal hanging over Andrew has threatened to overshadow the queen’s Platinum Jubilee this year, marking her 70 years on the throne. Any jury trial could have coincided with nationwide jubilee celebrations due to take place in the summer.

The queen on Wednesday resumed in-person meetings, having isolated for a week after Charles and his wife both tested positive for Covid-19, suggesting she has avoided the disease.

‘No way back’

British media called on Andrew to withdraw entirely from public life, after he was already stripped of his honorary military ranks and the title of “His Royal Highness”.

“Andrew is finished — undone by his insufferable arrogance, entitlement and staggering naivety,” popular tabloid The Sun said in its editorial.

“He must retreat entirely from public life and live out his retirement in ignominy.”

Opposition Labour MP Rachael Maskell demanded that Andrew also lose his Duke of York title to show “respect” for the people of the northern English city, which she represents.

The staunchly royalist Daily Mail said in its front-page headline that there was “no way back” for Andrew, who withdrew from royal duties in 2019 after a widely panned BBC interview.

Inside, the paper slammed Andrew for a “vile smear campaign” against Giuffre.

British commentators and social media users also mocked Andrew for claiming he had never met Giuffre, querying why he had agreed in that case to settle for such an apparently large amount.

Many pointed to a photograph of the pair together when she was 17. His lawyers had questioned the authenticity of the photo, which also showed socialite and Epstein friend Ghislaine Maxwell.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

In December, Maxwell was convicted of recruiting and grooming young girls to be sexually abused by Epstein.

RELATED STORIES

Prince Andrew settlement allows UK royals to keep calm and carry on

Prince Andrew, accuser name witnesses in sex assault lawsuit

Prince Andrew settles sex assault lawsuit with Virginia Giuffre

What next for Prince Andrew? US sex assault lawsuit explained

TAGS: Prince Andrew, settlement, Sex Assault

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.