Lagman: 8 SC justices who ousted Sereno 'deserve to be impeached' | Inquirer News

Lagman: 8 SC justices who ousted Sereno ‘deserve to be impeached’

/ 10:31 AM May 18, 2018

The eight Supreme Court (SC) justices who voted to oust former Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno “deserve to be impeached,” the leader of the House Magnificent 7 opposition bloc underscored on Friday.

“The immutable rule is that injustice does not pay,” Albay 1st District Rep. Edcel Lagman said in a statement.

“If magistrates who are sworn to uphold the Constitution, subvert the very fundamental law by arrogating jurisdiction over an impeachable official, perforce they deserve to be impeached,” he added.

Article continues after this advertisement

Lagman’s statement comes after Akbayan Rep. Tom Villarin bared a plan, supported by the Magnificent 7, to file impeachment complaints against  Associate Justices Teresita J. Leonardo-De Castro, Diosdado M. Peralta, Lucas P. Bersamin, Francis H. Jardeleza, Samuel R. Martires, Noel G. Tijam, Andres B. Reyes Jr., and Alexander G. Gesmundo– the eight justices who nullified Sereno’s appointment last May 11.

FEATURED STORIES

READ: Akbayan Rep to file impeachment cases vs 8 SC justices who voted to oust Sereno

Lagman maintained that an impeachment process, “not a flawed quo warranto petition,” should be the appropriate sanction against the eight “grievously errant justices” who ousted Sereno.

Article continues after this advertisement

Like Villarin, Lagman believes the eight justices were liable for culpable violation of the Constitution and betrayal of public trust, among other impeachable offenses.

Article continues after this advertisement

“The Constitution unequivocally mandates that it is only by impeachment instituted by the House of Representatives and conviction by the Senate can an impeachable official be removed from office. No other procedure is allowed, certainly not an aberration of a quo warranto action,” the lawmaker pointed out.

Article continues after this advertisement

The congressman also stressed that the principle that “the majority of the Supreme Court say is the law “would “not cleanse the gross blunder committed by the eight Justices.”

“The act of promulgating their unconstitutional decision completes the consummation of the impeachable offenses,” Lagman said.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Only a contrite and complete recantation by reconsidering their unlawful, controversial and unpopular decision can save the eight Justices from impeachment,” he continued.

Last Friday, the Supreme Court, voting 8-6, granted the quo warranto petition that sought to remove Sereno from office.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

The petition was filed by Solicitor General Jose Calida – the principal lawyer of the government. /muf

TAGS: Impeachment, Lagman, quo warranto, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.