Bishops ask: Is there not a separation of powers? | Inquirer News
DUTERTE DIRECTIVE TO HOUSE ON SERENO IMPEACHMENT

Bishops ask: Is there not a separation of powers?

/ 07:25 AM April 11, 2018

Manila Auxiliary Bishop Broderick Pabillo. INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

President Rodrigo Duterte has no right to order Congress to expedite the impeachment of Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno, Catholic bishops said on Tuesday.

“How can [Mr. Duterte] order Congress? Is there not a separation of powers? He really has a dictatorial bent,” said Manila Auxiliary Bishop Broderick Pabillo.

Article continues after this advertisement

On Monday, the President, insisting he had no hand in the moves to remove Sereno from office, declared himself an “enemy” of Sereno and said the Chief Justice was “bad for the Philippines.”

FEATURED STORIES

He said he would ask the House of Representatives to fast-track the impeachment of Sereno.

Malacañang on Tuesday walked back President’s statement, saying it was directed at the members of his party PDP-Laban in the House.

Article continues after this advertisement

Blaming others

Article continues after this advertisement

“The President, as party chair of the PDP-Laban, called for the impeachment of Chief Justice Sereno. This was directed to the House of Representatives members belonging to the PDP-Laban,” presidential spokesperson Harry Roque said in a statement.

Article continues after this advertisement

Pabillo said the President was blaming others for his ineffectiveness.

No right

Article continues after this advertisement

Sorsogon Bishop Arturo Bastes said the President had no right to order Congress, an independent institution, to hasten the impeachment of Sereno.

“His act of ordering Congress is a sign of his being dictatorial and authoritarian, a breach of the Philippine Constitution. His act is impeachable,” Bastes said.

Opposition coalitions also protested the President’s attacks on Sereno, reminding him that he was neither above the Constitution nor was he the state.

Tindig Pilipinas and Movement Against Tyranny questioned how the President could disown the quo warranto petition brought by Solicitor General Jose Calida against Sereno then order him to “do his best” in oral arguments before the Supreme Court on Tuesday.

‘So much polarization’

“His brusque order for the House of Representatives to fast-track an impeachment process his solicitor general has tried to derail gives lie to his efforts to wash his hands [of] this persecution of Sereno,” the Movement Against Tyranny said in a statement.

Tindig Pilipinas said the Duterte administration had “caused so much polarization, acrimony, repeated violations of the rule of law and corruption.”

“[To] declare anyone an enemy who displeases you, much more someone who is your equal in [government] under the Constitution, is unbecoming of someone who styles himself a humble civil servant,” the group said in a statement.

Opposition Sen. Antonio Trillanes IV insisted at a news conference on Tuesday that the President was behind the moves to remove Sereno from office.

In the House, opposition lawmakers said the Chief Executive, by asking Speaker Pantaleon Alvarez to hasten the impeachment of Sereno, showed himself to be the mastermind of the moves to unseat the Chief Justice.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

“President Duterte’s attacks against Chief Justice Sereno is also an attack against democracy, which only displays his dictatorial desires and plans to control all branches of government,” ACT Teachers Rep. France Castro said in a statement. —With reports from Christine O. Avendaño, Nikko Dizon and DJ Yap

TAGS: Jose Calida, OSG, Rodrigo Duterte, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.