5 magistrates refuse to challenge selves in quo warranto case | Inquirer News

5 magistrates refuse to challenge selves in quo warranto case

/ 02:22 PM April 10, 2018

Maria Lourdes Sereno

Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno INQUIRER PHOTO / RICHARD A REYES

Five associate justices of the Supreme Court (SC) have refused to recuse themselves from participating in the proceedings on the quo warranto petition to oust Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno.

The five magistrates were Associate Justices Teresita Leonardo De Castro, Noel Tijam, Lucas Bersamin, Diosdado Peralta and Francis Jardeleza.

Article continues after this advertisement

“All motions for inhibition were denied for lack of merit. All justices will explain their decision together with the resolution of this case,” Senior Associate Justice Antonio Carpio, now acting Chief Justice said at the start of the oral argument on the quo warranto case in Baguio City.

FEATURED STORIES

In her motions to inhibit, citing Article III, Section 1 of the 1987 Constitution, Sereno said “due process of law requires a hearing before an impartial and disinterested tribunal, and that every litigant is entitled to nothing less than the cold neutrality of an impartial judge.”

All the five justices appeared before the House Committee on Justice and testified in the impeachment complaint against the Chief Justice. /jpv

Article continues after this advertisement

RELATED STORY

5 SC justices won’t inhibit selves in petition vs Sereno

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Impeachment, Justice, quo warranto, Sereno

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.