House minority urges Duterte to review Cabinet members | Inquirer News
After DOJ’s acquittal of drug lords

House minority urges Duterte to review Cabinet members

/ 03:35 PM March 14, 2018

Danilo Suarez

House minority leader Danilo Suarez. INQUIRER FILE PHOTO/LYN RILLON

President Rodrigo Duterte should “review” the personalities in his cabinet to determine their fitness to hold their position, House of Representatives minority members urged on Wednesday in the wake of the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) acquittal of suspected drug lords.

“The justice secretary will be reminded that he is part of the President’s executive family. In matter fulfilling under his jurisdiction, generally, his actions and decisions are deemed those of the President’s,” the minority bloc said in a statement, which was also read by Minority Leader Rep. Danilo Suarez in a briefing.

Article continues after this advertisement

Just two years into Justice Secretary Vitaliano Aguirre II’s term, minority members said he had “already put under question the integrity of his office and attached agencies.”

FEATURED STORIES

“This is alarming, given the vast powers that the secretary of justice can exercise. In light of this, we call upon the President to review the personalities of his official family and determine their fitness to hold their positions,” they added.

Pressed if Aguirre should resign, Buhay party-list Rep. Jose “Lito” Atienza Jr. said: “Pinagpapaliwanag pa siya eh (He’s being asked to explain)… let’s wait for it.”

Article continues after this advertisement

The minority bloc likewise questioned why would there be insufficient evidence against self-confessed drug lord Kerwin Espinosa.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Why would there be insufficient evidence when Espinosa himself admitted being a drug lord? During a Senate investigation in November 2016, Espinosa claimed that he had annual gross sales of P50 million while giving out P20 million as protection money for those involved in his illegal drug network. Where is justice here?” they asked.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Senator de Lima was indicted because of allegations that she conspired with these personalities. Does this mean that the charges against senator De Lima are baseless?” they added.

Aside from Espinosa, suspected drug triad boss Peter Lim, President Rodrigo Duterte’s “kumpadre” (wedding co-sponsor), was also absolved of drug trafficking charges.

Article continues after this advertisement

The DOJ panel dismissed the case against suspected drug lords citing the weak evidence presented by the Criminal Investigation and Detection Group (CIDG) and the “inconsistencies” in the testimony of its lone witness, Marcelo Adorco.

The decision, approved by acting-Prosecutor General Jorge Catalan Jr., was issued last Dec. 20, 2017, but was only discovered by media on Monday.

READ: DOJ clears suspected drug lord

But Aguirre and Presidential Spokesperson Harry Roque said the charges against Espinosa, Lim and 20 others had not been dismissed with finality and was still subject to review.

“Wala pa pong pinal na desisyon (There is no final decision yet),” said Roque.

READ: Case vs suspected drug lords ‘far from being final’ – Roque

Aguirre has also ordered the creation of a new panel of prosecutors to review the resolution and has directed the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) to investigate the prosecutors who dismissed the drug case. /je

RELATED STORIES

Aguirre to NBI: Probe state prosecutors

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Aguirre forms panel to review dismissed drug cases vs Lim, Kerwin

TAGS: acquittal, Aguirre, DoJ, drug lord, Review, Rodrigo Duterte

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.