House panel OKs bill urging permanent dwelling on Kalayaan Islands | Inquirer News
‘ALIENABLE AND DISPOSABLE’ LAND

House panel OKs bill urging permanent dwelling on Kalayaan Islands

By: - Reporter / @deejayapINQ
/ 07:25 AM December 27, 2017

PAGASA Soldiers and their families live on Pagasa, the biggest
island in the Kalayaan Group. The island has an airstrip used by
themilitary in supplying the community. —PHOTO COURTESY OF PAF

The House of Representatives wants to encourage “permanent dwelling” in the Kalayaan Group of Islands, a 79-hectare chain of islets and reefs occupied by the Philippines in the disputed Spratly archipelago, by allowing residents and investors to obtain titles to the land.

The House committee on natural resources has approved House Bill No. 5614 that would declare the Kalayaan Group, which is part of the province of Palawan, “alienable and disposable” land for agricultural, residential and commercial purposes.

Article continues after this advertisement

At a hearing before the Christmas break, the bill authored by Speaker Pantaleon Alvarez and Majority Leader Rodolfo Fariñas was approved by the panel after it was sponsored by Southern Leyte Rep. Roger Mercado.

FEATURED STORIES

Alienable and disposable

In their explanatory note, Alvarez and Fariñas cited the urgent need to declare landholdings in the Kalayaan Group alienable and disposable to “promote permanent dwelling and develop a viable source of livelihood for the residents therein.”

Article continues after this advertisement

The declaration will promote the growth of business opportunities and spur the development of trade and industry by attracting investors to the area, according to the House leaders.

Article continues after this advertisement

Alvarez said the Kalayaan Group offered rich fishing grounds, and significant oil and natural gas reserves. It is “vital to the security and economic survival of the Philippines,” he said in the note.

Article continues after this advertisement

He further said the municipality of Kalayaan was in the process of making new projects to promote tourism for the island group and inviting Filipino entrepreneurs to invest in Kalayaan.

Reluctant investors

Article continues after this advertisement

But investors are “reluctant because the island group is inalienable and nondisposable for agricultural, residential and commercial purposes,” he said.

“Even residents who have been long tilling and developing the parcels of land within the Kalayaan Group cannot apply for title for their occupied area,” he added.

Under Presidential Decree No. 1596, the Kalayaan Group is considered a distinct and separate municipality of the province of Palawan, and it is now known as the municipality of Kalayaan.

Kalayaan, according to Fariñas, is composed of islets and reefs with a total land area of 79 hectares, including the biggest island called Pag-asa with 32.7 ha; Likas, 18.6 ha; Parda, 12.7 ha; Lawak, 7.9 ha; Kota, 6.45 ha; Patag, 0.57 ha and Parata, 0.44 ha.

The small Ayungin (Second Thomas) Shoal and Rizal (Commodore) Reef are also part of the archipelago.

There is a small community on Pag-asa, composed of soldiers and their families. The island has an airstrip, used by the military in supplying the community.

Ayungin Shoal, also known as Ayungin Reef, hosts a small Philippine garrison aboard the BRP Sierra Madre, a rusting medical ship that the government grounded there in 1999 to mark the country’s territory in the Spratlys after China seized Panganiban Reef (Mischief Reef) in 1995.

Military dev’t plans

At the hearing, Armed Forces Deputy Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Salvador Melchor Mison Jr. spoke about the military’s development plans for the nine Kalayaan islands that would cost P11.6 billion.

The development plans include enhancement of the habitability of the islands, construction of a berthing space for Philippine Navy vessels and other vessels, upgrading of the defense structures of the islands, improvement of existing facilities, such as roads and airstrip, and provision of water and power facilities and communication equipment.

Angry response from China

Any Philippine activity in Kalayaan, however, will surely draw an angry response from China, which claims nearly all of the South China Sea, including waters within the Philippines’ 370-kilometer exclusive economic zone called West Philippine Sea.

The UN-backed Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague, ruling in July last year in a case brought by the Philippines, invalidated China’s sweeping claims.

But Beijing, which did not take part in the arbitration, refused to recognize the ruling and went ahead building artificial islands on reefs in the Spratlys and topping them with military installations.

President Duterte, who came to power last year, has refused to assert the ruling, preferring improvement of diplomatic and economic relations with China.

Any construction in the Kalayaan Group will also violate a 2002 status quo agreement between China and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (Asean) to maintain peace and stability in the South China Sea, although China goes on building in the waterway with impunity.

A government report posted on a website run by China’s National Marine Data and Information Service and the overseas edition of the ruling Communist Party’s People’s Daily says China has enhanced its military presence in the South China Sea and “reasonably” expanded the area covered by the artificial islands.

Apart from what it termed “large radar”—it is unclear if the report is referring to more than one—construction this year has included facilities for underground storage and administrative buildings.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

In contrast, the Philippines has been forced to stop construction of thatch and bamboo shelters for fishermen on Sandy Cay, a sandbar not far from the Kalayaan Group, when China protested the activity as a violation of the status quo agreement with Asean.

TAGS: House of Representatives

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.