No reason to indict Sombero | Inquirer News
ON TARGET

No reason to indict Sombero

/ 05:01 AM October 31, 2017

Ombudsman Conchita Carpio Morales has either become senile or she didn’t read the news on the P50-million bribery case involving two immigration officials.

Otherwise, how could she have approved the recommendation to indict Wally Sombero for plunder in the incident that happened at the City of Dreams casino?

Sombero was just a courier of casino mogul Jack Lam who bribed Immigration Deputy Commissioners Michael Robles and Al Argosino.

Article continues after this advertisement

Sombero handed the P50 million in cash to the two officials.

FEATURED STORIES

Robles and Argosino deserved their comeuppance — a charge of plunder filed by the Ombudsman against them in the Sandiganbayan.

But also indicting Sombero is like shooting the bearer of bad news.

Article continues after this advertisement

It was Sombero’s statement to this columnist about the bribery that led to my exposé. In turn, it resulted in a Senate hearing and the Ombudsman’s investigation.

Article continues after this advertisement

The former police official testified against Robles and Argosino and even presented to the Senate a video of the two men receiving the money.

Article continues after this advertisement

There is no rhyme nor reason to indict Sombero for plunder. What he can be accused of is corruption of a public official.

But then again, Lam should be included in the charge of corruption of a public official as the principal since the bribe money came from him.

Article continues after this advertisement

Since Robles and Argosino have not escaped being charged with plunder as Justice Secretary Vitaliano Aguirre II would have wanted, it is more likely they will start talking.

The two officials who quit their posts shortly after the scandal erupted were probably expecting their fraternity “brod” and former boss at the Department of Justice to back them up to the hilt.

Aguirre had said that they would be charged only with bribery, a bailable offense, instead of plunder, which is nonbailable.

He added that the two couldn’t be charged with plunder since P1,000 was missing from the P50 million recovered from them.

P50 million is the threshold for a plunder case to be filed against a government official.

People in Lopez, Quezon province, Argosino’s hometown, say that Al was just following orders from higher-ups.

* * *

My friend, controversial businessman Kim Wong, clarified that he was spending only P100 million in building houses for Marawi City residents.

I reported in Saturday’s column that Wong was spending P200 million.

“People might think I’m so rich to spend that much money,” Wong said.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Okay, you’re not that rich, Kim. You just have a lot of money.

TAGS: Al Argosino, Conchita Carpio-Morales, Jack Lam bribery attempt, Kim Wong, On Target, Ramon Tulfo, Wally Sombero

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.