Trump to insist on border wall funds as budget deadline looms | Inquirer News

Trump to insist on border wall funds as budget deadline looms

/ 09:02 AM April 24, 2017

A border patrol agent drives along the US- Mexico border crossing on January 26, 2017 in San Ysidro, California. President Donald Trump has ordered work to begin on building a wall along the Mexican border, angering his southern neighbor with his hardline stance on immigration. / AFP PHOTO / DAVID MCNEW

A border patrol agent drives along the US- Mexico border crossing on January 26, 2017, in San Ysidro, California.
President Donald Trump has ordered work to begin on building a wall along the Mexican border, angering his southern neighbor with his hardline stance on immigration. AFP

WASHINGTON, United States — High-powered aides to Donald Trump pressed for funding of a Mexico border wall Sunday as a looming spending showdown in Congress threatens to shut down the US government on the president’s 100th day in office.

Funding for the wall was Trump’s signature campaign promise, and the White House appeared determined to get Congress to approve a down payment as part of a bigger bill to keep the US government funded.

Article continues after this advertisement

White House budget chief Mick Mulvaney said the administration is prepared to make concessions to Democrats on health care reform in order to get the wall money.

FEATURED STORIES

But if the wall isn’t funded, will the president veto the larger spending bill, risking a government shut down on Saturday — coincidentally Trump’s 100th day in office?

“Don’t know yet,” Mulvaney said on Fox News Sunday. “We are asking for our priorities and importantly we are offering to give Democrats some of their priorities as well.”

Article continues after this advertisement

The specter of a government shutdown has often loomed over US budget negotiations. The threat has most often been averted — but has come to pass several times, most recently for 16 days in 2013 amid a dispute over funding for Barack Obama’s signature health care reforms.

Article continues after this advertisement

Democrats showed little interest in a compromise this time around.

Article continues after this advertisement

“I hope the president will back off,” said Senator Dick Durbin, the number two Democrat in the Senate, on CNN’s “State of the Union.”

“To think that he would consider shutting down the government of the United States of America over this outlandish proposal of a border wall, which we can’t even pay for at this point, and is opposed by Democrats and Republicans all along the border, that would be the height of irresponsibility,” he said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Mulvaney insisted, however: “Shutdown is not desired and it’s not a tool, it’s not something we want to have.

“We want our priorities funded and one of the biggest priorities during the campaign was border security, keeping Americans safe and part of that was a border wall.”

US Attorney General Jeff Sessions and Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly made similar pitches on other television talk shows.

“I think it’s certainly worth hard negotiation over,” said Kelly on CBS’s “Face the Nation.”

“We have tremendous threats, whether it’s drugs, people, potential terrorists, coming up from the south. And some type of a barrier, an effective barrier backed up by the brave and very effective men and women of DHS, I believe is essential.”

Sessions said Trump would decide whether the wall money was worth risking a government shutdown for.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

“But I know one thing, we need that wall,” he said on ABC’s “This Week.” “It will help us complete the promise that the president has made to the American people. That’s what they want.” CBB

TAGS: border wall, Congress, Donald Trump, Mexico, News, US Budget

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.