SC orders De Lima to answer disbarment case
Sen. Leila De Lima. MARIANNE BERMUDEZ/INQUIRER FILE PHOTO
The Supreme Court has ordered Senator Leila De Lima to respond to the disbarment case filed against her regarding her admission that she had a romantic relationship with her former driver Ronnie Dayan, blaming the “frailties of a woman.”
During Tuesday’s en banc, the high court gave De Lima 10 days to respond to the complaint of Atty. Fernando P. Perito.
“The Court directed respondent De Lima to submit her comment to the Complaint-Affidavit for disbarment filed by petitioner within 10 days from notice of the Court’s resolution,” the high court said.
Perito’s complaint stemmed from De Lima’s interview last year with Mareng Winnie’s “Bawal ang Pasaway” where she admitted that her affair with Dayan was because of the “frailties of a woman.”
Aside from Perito, the Volunteers Against Crime and Corruption (VACC) together with former National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) officials Reynaldo Esmeralda and Ruel Lasala and whistleblower Sandra Cam also filed a disbarment complaint accusing the senator of gross immorality, violation of the Lawyers Oath and the Code of Professional Responsibility.
READ: Ex-NBI officials, VACC call for De Lima disbarment
Aside from supposed illicit relationship with Dayan, they accused De Lima of allegedly benefiting from illegal drug trade inside the New Bilibid Prison (NBP).
“Measured against the definition of gross immorality, we find Senator De Lima’s actions grossly immoral. Her actions were so corrupt as to approximate a criminal act, for she has a relationship with a married man, who in all appearances, was married to another and with whom he has a family. Her actions were also unprincipled and reprehensible to the highest degree,” the complaint stated.
“All these taken together leads to the inescapable conclusion that respondent (De Lima) was grossly imprudent in managing her personal affairs. The fact remains that her relationship with Ronnie Dayan, a married man, is grossly immoral. Worse, she never denied such relationship,” it added.
READ: Aguirre: De Lima’s admission of affair bolsters disbarment rap
De Lima has three other pending disbarment cases. All the other cases were filed in 2012.
Private lawyer Agustin Sundiam asked the high court to take disciplinary action against De Lima and former Presidential spokesperson Atty. Edwin Lacierda for their utterances and remarks on national television where they called the late Chief Justice Renato Corona a “lawless tyrant.”
Sundiam said the two secretaries violated their oath as lawyers requiring them to “observe and maintain the respect and dignity due to the courts of justice and judicial offers.”
In 2012, Perito, Atty. Ricardo Rivera and Nephtali Aliposa filed a separate disbarment complaint against De Lima’s alleged defiance in following a Supreme Court temporary restraining order issued November 2011 when she stopped former President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo and her husband Jose Miguel “Mike” Arroyo from leaving the country. RAM/rga
