Ex-NBI officials, VACC call for De Lima disbarment | Inquirer News

Ex-NBI officials, VACC call for De Lima disbarment

/ 03:01 PM October 28, 2016

Leila de Lima, Sandra Cam, Supreme Court, VACC, disbarment

VACC and two former NBI officials file a complaint before the Supreme Court seeking the disbarment of Sen. Leila de Lima. TETCH TORRES-TUPAS,/INQUIRER.net

The Volunteers Against Crime and Corruption (VACC) together with former ranking officials of the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) want Senator Leila de Lima stripped of her title as a lawyer.

In a 43-page complaint filed before the high court’s Office of the Bar Confidant, VACC, together with former NBI officials Reynaldo Esmeralda and Ruel Lasala and whistle blower Sandra Cam, said De Lima should be disbarred for gross immorality, violation of the Lawyers’ Oath and the Code of Professional Responsibility.

Article continues after this advertisement

“The practice of law is a privilege…It is a privilege that can be revoked, subject to the mandate of due process once a lawyer violates his oath and the dictates of legal ethics,” the complaint stated.

FEATURED STORIES

The complaint was based on the testimonies of witnesses during the House Committee on Justice’s probe on the proliferation of illegal drugs inside the New Bilibid Prison (NBP).

Based on the testimonies of witnesses including NBI officials and high profile inmates, complainants said “respondent in this case knew that what were sold and traded were all prohibited drugs. Sen. De Lima did not only provide protection for the incarcerated drug lords to ensure the proliferation of illegal drug trade, not only inside Bilibid but also from the outside.”

Article continues after this advertisement

The witnesses who testified in Congress against De Lima were  former NBI Deputy Director and former Bureau of Corrections (BuCor) officer-in-charge Rafael Ragos; NBI agent Jovencio P. Ablen; Presidential Security Group (PSG) member Joenel Sanchez; PSG member Romel Falcasantos; P/Supt. Jerry C. Valeroso; Reynante D. Diaz; Rodolfo T. Magleo (Bilibid inmate); Herbert R. Colanggo (Bilibid inmate); Noel G. Martinez (Bilibid inmate); Jaime Patcho (Bilibid inmate); Hans Anton Tan (Bilibid inmate); Froilan “Poypoy” L. Trestiza (Bilibid inmate); Jojo R. Baligad (Bilibid inmate); Engelberto A. Durano (Bilibid inmate); Nonilo A. Arile (Bilibid inmate); Joel D. Capones (Bilibid inmate); Wu Tuan Yuan aka Peter Co (Bilibid inmate); and Vicente Sy (Bilibid inmate).

Article continues after this advertisement

Complainants said De Lima tolerated the illegal drug trade inside prison to support her Senate bid.

Article continues after this advertisement

They noted that De Lima spent P86.1 million during the campaign.

“For all the [advertisements] she contracted during the election campaign, where would she get the money from? One could not turn a blind eye on her actual source of [funds]. She had generous benefactors from inside the Bilibid,” the complaint stated.

Article continues after this advertisement

The complaint also mentioned De Lima’s alleged illicit relationship with her former driver Ronnie Dayan.

The complaint cited the testimony of Sanchez who, before Congress, said he saw two videos of De Lima when her driver managed to pry into Dayan’s phone. Sanchez also describsed De Lima’s closeness to Dayan.

“Measured against the definition of gross immorality, we find Senator De Lima’s actions grossly immoral. Her actions were so corrupt as to approximate a criminal act, for she has a relationship with a married man, who in all appearances, was married to another and with whom he has a family. Her actions were also unprincipled and reprehensible to the highest degree,” the complaint stated.

“All these taken together leads to the inescapable conclusion that respondent (De Lima) was grossly imprudent in managing her personal affairs. The fact remains that her relationship with Ronnie Dayan, a married man, is grossly immoral. Worse, she never denied such relationship,” it added.

De Lima has three other disbarment cases pending. All the other cases were filed in 2012.

Private lawyer Agustin Sundiam asked the high court to take disciplinary action against De Lima and former presidential spokesperson Atty. Edwin Lacierda for their utterances and remarks on national television where they called Chief Justice Renato Corona a “lawless tyrant.”

Sundiam said the two secretaries violated their oath as lawyers requiring them to “observe and maintain the respect and dignity due to the courts of justice and judicial offers.”

READ: Supreme Court tosses De Lima, Lacierda disbarment to IBP

The other complaints against De Lima were filed separately by Atty. Ricardo Rivera and Fernando Perito and Nephtali Aliposa, both about De Lima’s alleged defiance in following a Supreme Court temporary restraining order issued November 2011 when she stopped former President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo and her husband Jose Miguel “Mike” Arroyo from leaving the country for medical treatment. CDG/rga

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

READ: I didn’t defy TRO favoring Arroyo – De Lima

TAGS: disbarment, Leila de Lima, Sandra Cam, Supreme Court, VACC

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.