SC to order Robredo to respond to electoral protest of Marcos | Inquirer News

SC to order Robredo to respond to electoral protest of Marcos

/ 05:14 PM July 12, 2016

The Supreme Court (SC), sitting as the Presidential Electoral Tribunal (PET), has acted on the election protest of former Sen. Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr. against Vice President Ma. Leonor “Leni” Robredo.

The high court has decided to require Robredo to respond to the protest of the former senator. She will be ordered to submit an “answer” based on the PET rules.

At a press conference, the high court’s information chief Theodore Te said the PET would issue a resolution “in due course.”

Article continues after this advertisement

PET is composed of the 15 Supreme Court justices.

FEATURED STORIES

Marcos filed his protest against Robredo after she won by a margin of 263,473 votes. He wants the PET to set aside the Vice President’s proclamation.

READ: Marcos asks SC to set aside Robredo proclamation, files protest

Article continues after this advertisement

Subject of his protest is the reopening of ballot boxes in each of the 36,465 clustered precincts in Cebu, Leyte, Negros Occidental, Negros Oriental, Masbate, Zamboanga del Sur, Zamboanga del Norte, Bukidnon, Iloilo, Bohol, Quezon, Batangas, Western Samar, Misamis Oriental, Camarines Sur, second district of Northern Samar, Palawan, Sibugay, Misamis Occidental, Pangasinan, Isabela, Iloilo City, Bacolod City, Cebu City, Lapu-Lapu City and Zamboanga City.

Article continues after this advertisement

Marcos is also asking the PET to annul the election results in Lanao del Sur, Basilan and Maguindanao, where the ballots have been pre-shaded, and recount votes in 22 provinces and five cities./rga

Article continues after this advertisement

RELATED STORIES

Leni unfazed by Bongbong’s election protest

Article continues after this advertisement

Marcos protest ‘dismissible’–election lawyer

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS:

No tags found for this post.
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.