Ouch! Flu spray fails again, panel urges shot instead | Inquirer News

Ouch! Flu spray fails again, panel urges shot instead

/ 10:18 AM June 23, 2016

FILE- In this Oct. 4, 2005 file photo, a Danielle Holland reacts as she is given a FluMist influenza vaccination in St. Leonard, Md. On Wednesday, June 22, 2016, federal officials reported the latest in a growing series of study findings that show AstraZeneca's nasally-administered FluMist has not been working. (AP Photo/Chris Gardner, File)

In this Oct. 4, 2005 file photo, a Danielle Holland reacts as she is given a FluMist influenza vaccination in St. Leonard, Maryland. On Wednesday, June 22, 2016, federal officials reported the latest in a growing series of study findings that show AstraZeneca’s nasally-administered FluMist has not been working. AP

NEW YORK, United States — The nasal spray version of the annual flu vaccine failed to protect kids again last year, the latest in a string of failures that has prompted an expert panel to recommend that doctors stop giving it to patients.

Health officials reported Wednesday that the spray performed dismally for the third straight year, while the traditional flu shot — the one that stings — worked reasonably well this winter.


READ: Mysterious flu-like disease kills 16 in two weeks in Nepal | Brazil hit with more than 1,000 swine flu deaths


“We could find no evidence (the spray) was effective,” said Dr. Joseph Bresee, a flu expert at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The product, AstraZeneca’s FluMist, was once regarded as the best vaccine for protecting children against flu. Only two years ago, officials advised doctors that whenever possible they should use FluMist on young kids instead of flu shots.

On Wednesday, a federal advisory committee on immunization voted to retract its endorsement of the vaccine after preliminary CDC study results presented to the committee showed it provided no protection from the flu strain that made most people sick last year.

Recommendations from the committee are usually adopted by the government, which sends the guidance out to doctors.

Most Americans get the vaccine in the form of a shot.

FluMist is the only spray-in-the-nose vaccine on the market. It was first licensed in 2003 and is approved for healthy people ages 2 to 49. Unlike shots made from a killed virus, it is made from a live but weakened flu virus.


The nasal spray accounts for just 8 percent of the total flu vaccine doses produced each year. But because it’s mainly used in kids, about a third of the flu vaccinations of children were done with FluMist, health officials say.

Early studies, including randomized trials coordinated by the manufacturer, showed FluMist was highly effective, and in children performed better than traditional flu shots.

The numbers looked so good that in 2014 the committee made the unusual decision to advise doctors that FluMist was better at preventing flu in healthy kids ages 2 through 8.

But since then, studies have shown the vaccine didn’t work well against the most common flu strains in any of the past three flu seasons. All flu vaccines performed poorly two winters ago, but data show FluMist performed poorly the two other seasons as well.

During the winter that just ended, flu shots were nearly 50 percent effective against the flu strain that made most people sick. But FluMist didn’t work at all, CDC researchers said, citing preliminary results from a study of about 2,300 U.S. children.

Experts were particularly worried that FluMist hasn’t protected against H1N1, a type of flu that often causes more deaths and hospitalizations among children and young adults.

But there’s no evidence of a jump in flu deaths among kids who were thought to have been protected by FluMist, Bresee said.

It’s not clear why the vaccine isn’t working.

Some have argued that FluMist’s former reputation hinged on studies that were done before flu vaccine was encouraged for most children and when vaccination rates were much lower.

Experts said it is possible that kids who have received the spray many times no longer respond as well to it.

Bresee said some suspect that it is has to do with the decision a few years ago to incorporate four strains of flu in FluMist instead of the traditional three. It could be that the added strain reduced the body’s response to another strain, he said.

AstraZeneca presented its own U.S. study that found the FluMist vaccine was somewhat effective this past season, but still not did not work as well as flu shots. A spokeswoman said the company is evaluating the committee’s decision.

Many doctors, hospitals and flu clinics place their orders for flu vaccine early in the year. So the panel’s decision may pose a problem for fall flu vaccination campaigns that target kids.

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

“It would really disrupt the vaccine supply,” said Dr. William Schaffner, a Vanderbilt University vaccine expert.

TAGS: AstraZeneca, CDC, flu, FluMist, H1N1, nasal spray, News, Vaccination

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.