‘Guards are not traffic enforcers’ | Inquirer News

‘Guards are not traffic enforcers’

/ 07:10 AM October 18, 2011

When a car pulls out of a parking lot, sometimes the building’s security guard helps guide it out by stopping passing cars.

Not a good idea, said Cebu City Traffic Operations Management (Citom) chairman Sylvan Jakosalem.

He said security guards shouldn’t act as traffic enforcers in these situations since this would cause traffic congestion in the main roads.

Article continues after this advertisement

He sent  letters to establishment owners telling them this was a  a violation by  security guards who  go out  of their way to assist their clients’ cars out of the car park.

FEATURED STORIES

“They must be deputized by Citom to do that. They must bear in mind that the cars in the main thoroughfares must be given priority,” he said.

Jakosalem said he was also worried about the rise of establishments in congested areas.

Article continues after this advertisement

He said parking plans of these buildings must be followed and reminded business owners that Citom may  put railings in lots that are not intended for parking.

Article continues after this advertisement

“The previous administration already did  it before. Railings  were installed in establishments that failed to comply with their parking plans,” Jakosalem said.

Article continues after this advertisement

He said vehicles in some establishments were doing diagonal parking instead of parallel parking.

Last week Jakosalem withdrew his plan to ask the  Citom board and  Mayor Michael Rama to include Citom in the approval of locational clearance of establishments. He agreed with  Councilor Ritchie Osmeña that  it would just add a layer of bureaucracy.  /Edison Delos Angeles

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS:

No tags found for this post.
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.