Enrile hits Catapang for prioritizing chain of command over SAF men | Inquirer News

Enrile hits Catapang for prioritizing chain of command over SAF men

/ 01:36 PM January 27, 2016

FACEOFF: Senator Juan Ponce Enrile (right) questions the priority of retired AFP chief Gregorio Pio Catapang during the reopening of the Senate's Mamasapano probe. YOUTUBE SCREENGRAB

FACEOFF: Senator Juan Ponce Enrile (right) questions the priority of retired AFP chief Gregorio Pio Catapang during the reopening of the Senate’s Mamasapano probe. YOUTUBE SCREENGRAB

Senator Juan Ponce Enrile called out retired Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) chief Gen. Gregorio Pio Catapang for failing to order his men to send reinforcement to the “poor and beleaguered” Special Action Force (SAF) troopers being pinned down in a cornfield during the deadly Mamasapano clash a year ago.

He also slammed Catapang for not informing President Benigno Aquino III about the situation in Mamasapano as the retired official said it was the Philippine National Police’s duty to inform the commander in chief.

Article continues after this advertisement

“You were in Zamboanga City. Did you inform the President about what’s happening?” asked Enrile.

FEATURED STORIES

Catapang said “No, sir.”

The Senator then said: “Why not? He’s your commander in chief?” Catapang answered: “That’s a PNP operation. The PNP should inform him about what’s happening.”

Article continues after this advertisement

An incensed Enrile said: “So the command system of the AFP and PNP was paralyzed that day that’s why we lost 44 troopers.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Catapang, his voice raised, defended himself: “The chain of command was not broken. The troops were on the ground. They were coordinating with (Getulio) Napeñas. These were decisions made by tactical commanders.”

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: AFP: Military sent reinforcement in Mamasapano clash

Napeñas was the director of SAF during the conduct of the operation.

Article continues after this advertisement

At the height of the encounter January 25 last year, Catapang headed to Zamboanga upon the instructions of President Aquino.

While the Mamasapano clash was happening, Aquino was in Zamboanga City to check on the bombing site there. Catapang said the President ordered him to proceed to Zamboanga “to discuss the bombing” that killed two persons.

“Discuss? Why? The Zamboanga bombing was over. What’s your priority as commander?”

Catapang explained that he was not aware about the “criticality of the situation.”

No request for helicopters

Earlier, Enrile told Catapang: “As a soldier you do not remove your boots. You must be prepared all the time, anytime, anywhere. Why did you not send air assets to cover these poor, beleaguered SAF troopers versus untrained elements?”

Catapang said he instructed Maj. Gen. Edmundo Pangilinan, military’s 6th Infantry Division, to “provide necessary requirements to help SAF men being engaged.”

But he said “it took some time for the ground commander to react.”

READ: ‘Don’t blame the military’

Catapang said there were about two to three helicopters prepositioned in Cotabato ready for deployment but the PNP “did not request for the air assets.”

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

“My god, do you need a request?” an incensed Enrile asked the AFP chief.

Catapang retorted: “We follow the chain of command, your honor. The decision to use the helicopter was relegated to the tactical commanders. We don’t macromanage operations because if we do that, every time there are encounters, they will ask me what to do. Pangilinan was making the decision, the battalion commander, lieutenants; that’s their job. I can’t macromanage them.” IDL

TAGS: AFP, chain of command, Mamasapano, Oplan Exodus, PNP‎, Probe, saf44, Senate

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.