95% of INQUIRER.net readers say Enrile bail a ‘special accommodation’ | Inquirer News

95% of INQUIRER.net readers say Enrile bail a ‘special accommodation’

/ 06:13 PM August 26, 2015

INQUIRER.net poll

Results of INQUIRER.net’s poll on Sen. Juan Ponce Enrile’s bail.

The Supreme Court gave Sen. Juan Ponce Enrile a “special accommodation” when it allowed him to post bail for a non-bailable offense, according to a majority of INQUIRER.net readers.

In an online poll conducted by INQUIRER.net, 13,428 readers or 95.91 percent answered “it’s very obvious” that the high court favored the 91-year-old senator in its decision.

ADVERTISEMENT

Meanwhile, 3.32 percent or 465 readers said it was only right for the Supreme Court to grant Enrile’s bail “because he is old and sickly.”

FEATURED STORIES

Less than one percent or 63 readers said they do not care about the issue, while 45 readers said they were not familiar with the case.

Enrile, who was detained at the Philippine National Police General Hospital for a year, is temporarily free after posting a P1.45-million bail for plunder over the pork barrel scam.

In a vote of 8-4, the high court granted Enrile’s motion to reverse the Sandiganbayan Third Division’s ruling that denied his bail plea.

READ: Enrile out on bail, says his faith in justness of Judiciary vindicated | SC grants Enrile bid for bail

In a 29-page dissenting opinion, Associate Justice Marvic Leonen said the high court gave special accommodation to Enrile, noting that “bail for humanitarian considerations is neither presently provided in Rules of Court nor found in any statute or provision of the Constitution.” Yuji Vincent Gonzales/JE

READ: Enrile bail a ‘special accommodation,’ says SC Justice

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: bail, INQUIRER.net, Marvic Leonen, poll, Supreme Court

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.