A whiff of fresh air | Inquirer News
ON TARGET

A whiff of fresh air

/ 12:41 AM July 11, 2015

The Supreme Court today is sensitive to the sentiments of the citizenry.

Chief Justice Maria Lourdes Sereno encourages the public to complain against corrupt or abusive judges, according to court insiders.

She has her eyes peeled and ears kept to the ground for any news about corruption and excesses in the judiciary, said the insiders who asked for anonymity.

Article continues after this advertisement

The assurance is like a whiff of fresh air.

FEATURED STORIES

* * *

Citizens who are victims of abusive or corrupt judges may want to file their complaints in the Office of the Court Administrator.

Article continues after this advertisement

This office which investigates judges is directly under the Supreme Court and holds office at the high court’s building on Padre Faura, Manila.

Article continues after this advertisement

It’s composed of young and idealistic lawyers who are graduates of Ivy League law schools.

Article continues after this advertisement

The court administrator and deputy court administrator have ranks equivalent to that of a Court of Appeals justice.

* * *

Article continues after this advertisement

Pasig City Assistant Prosecutor Fatima Manguiat-Ngaosi ignored the psychological damage a 43-year-old man inflicted on an 8-year-old boy when she downgraded the child abuse charge the man was facing.

The offender is Alejo Tagsim, a neighborhood bully who was drinking with his friends when he threw an empty glass at the boy’s face.

Tagsim was irritated by the noise the boy was making while playing with his friends.

The empty glass broke as it hit the boy’s face, leaving a physical—as well as a psychological—scar.

Guess what Ngaosi charged Tagsim with?

Slight physical injuries!

Child abuse is punishable by imprisonment of six to 12 years while those found guilty of slight physical injuries are penalized with a monthlong jail term.

Ngaosi said in her decision that the complainant—the victim’s mother—failed to prove that Tagsim’s act affected her son’s “psychological development.”

The boy’s mother told this columnist that since the incident, he has been constantly wetting the bed and waking up in the middle of the night, crying.

The boy is now undergoing professional counseling.

Ngaosi apparently doesn’t know that child abuse is defined as “psychological and physical abuse, neglect, cruelty, sexual abuse and emotional maltreatment.”

All of these elements, except neglect and sexual abuse, were present when Tagsim inflicted harm on the boy.

Did Ngaosi sleep through her psychology class in college or was there another reason behind her decision?

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

The same can be said of her boss, Pasig City Prosecutor Jacinto Ng, who approved her recommendation.

TAGS: child abuse, Supreme Court

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.