‘Congress can’t repeal anti-pork barrel law passed through people’s initiative’ | Inquirer News
Close  
NATIONAL UNION OF PEOPLE’S LAWYERS

‘Congress can’t repeal anti-pork barrel law passed through people’s initiative’

By: - Reporter / @JeromeAningINQ
/ 06:59 PM August 26, 2014

MANILA, Philippines—Congress cannot repeal an anti-pork barrel law approved by the people through a people’s initiative, a lawyers group said on Tuesday.

According to the National Union of People’s Lawyers, in a statement, said the power of the people to legislate through a people’s initiative is superior to Congress’ legislative authority.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The power of the people to validly initiate a law is but a direct exercise of their sovereignty. All government authority supposedly emanates from them,” NULP secretary general Edre Olalia said.

House of Representatives, Congress

Philippine Congress. AP FILE PHOTO

The NUPL is helping the promoters of a people’s initiative launched last Monday for the the enactment of a law prohibiting all kinds of “pork barrel.” The initiative must be signed by at least 10 percent of all voters nationwide and three percent of all voters in each legislative district before being presented again to voters in a referendum.

FEATURED STORIES

Fr. Ranhilio Aquino, a legal expert and the dean of the San Beda College Graduate School of Law, expressed misgivings Monday about a provision in the initiative proposal, which stated that once approved by the people, it may only be repealed, modified or amended by another law passed through initiative.

Aquino earlier said that Congress’ inherent power to legislate has been so written in the Constitution as practically limitless, and it could, if it wanted, repeal the anti-pork barrel law.

Olalia, however, said Congress derived its power to legislate from the people, upon whom, according to the Constitution, all sovereignty resided.

“Congress’ delegated power comes from the people. The water cannot rise above its source. It cannot undo the people’s initiative what it repeatedly fails and refuses to do,” he explained.

“If Congress repeals a law it has refused to enact and which their principals, the people, have initiated directly, it will be a “dizzy endless merry-go-round,” Olalia said, referring a possibility of people’s initiatives and congressional repeal taking place one after another.

If Aquino’s warning were true, then such a situation would “perpetuate till kingdom come a substantive evil that the principal—the people—has asked its agent—the lawmakers—to stop as they reneged on the public trust reposed in them,” the lawyer added.

The text of the initiative proposal was signed by about 5,000 people when the people’s initiative was launched on Monday at the Rizal Park.  Signatories to the initiative included Sr. Mary John Mananzan, co-chair of the Association of Major Religious Superiors of the Philippines co-chair, and Msgr. Romualdo Kintanar, Archdiocese of Cebu’s Discernment Group convenor.

ADVERTISEMENT

RELATED STORIES

Antipork groups try people’s initiative

People’s initiative vs pork launched

 

Read Next
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: 1987 Constitution, abolition of laws, Archdiocese of Cebu’s Discernment Group, Association of Major Religious Superiors of the Philippines, constitutional law, discretionary funds, Edre Olalia, General Appropriations Act, Government Budget, House of Representatives, law, Legislation, lump sum appropriations, Mary John Mananzan, National Budget, National Union of People’s Lawyers, News, People’s Initiative, Philippine Congress, Pork barrel, Priority Development Assistance Fund, Ranhilio Aquino, repeal of laws, Romualdo Kintanar, San Beda College Graduate School of Law, Senate
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.

News that matters

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and
acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.



© Copyright 1997-2022 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.