Latest charge vs Alcala ‘one more nuisance’ | Inquirer News

Latest charge vs Alcala ‘one more nuisance’

/ 08:13 AM June 27, 2014

Agriculture Secretary Proceso J. Alcala: Swamped with “nuisance suits”. FILE PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines–The Department of Agriculture on Thursday dismissed as a “nuisance suit” the latest plunder complaint filed against Secretary Proceso J. Alcala in the Office of the Ombudsman.

Dennis M. Guerrero, Alcala’s chief of staff, said that “baseless and unfounded” allegations of plunder were filed repeatedly against Alcala.

ADVERTISEMENT

Last Wednesday, the group called Youth Act Now! said it filed its complaint against Alcala for his alleged part in the “misuse of P36.25 million in PDAF (Priority Development Assistance Fund) when he was a lawmaker representing the second district of Quezon province.”

FEATURED STORIES

The group also accused Alcala of taking part as the agriculture secretary in the “transfer of P39 million in public funds to Janet Lim-Napoles and her NGOs.”

“These are cut-and-paste allegations lifted from previous propaganda campaigns against (Alcala),” Guerrero told reporters.

“There seems to be a cottage industry of those who find fault in everything he does,” Guerrero said. “We also see the hand of local politics in all of this.”

He said that of the four plunder cases filed against Alcala, the agriculture chief had received a copy of only one of them.

The Inquirer’s count, however, showed that the latest complaint was the fifth against Alcala.

The Kilusang Magbubukid ng Pilipinas filed the first case in October 2013, while lawyer Argee Guevarra filed two separate cases in December 2013 and January 2014.

ADVERTISEMENT

Earlier this month, Inquirer.net reported that the Metro Manila Vendors Association filed a complaint accusing Alcala of profiting from an allegedly overpriced deal to import 800,000 tons of milled rice from Vietnam.

“It’s so easy to find a group or even an individual to file plunder charges,” Alcala said in an interview on Thursday. “It’s so obvious there are (interest groups) behind these cases.”–Ronnel W. Domingo

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Ombudsman, Plunder

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.