Abad vs Abad on DAP’s legality | Inquirer News

Abad vs Abad on DAP’s legality

/ 06:21 PM November 19, 2013

Justice Roberto Abad and Budget Secretary Florencio Abad PHOTO FROM https://sc.judiciary.gov.ph/INQUIRER FILE PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines—A Supreme Court justice questioned Budget Secretary Florencio Abad what law allows them to pool government savings together and spend it for a particular purpose.

Abad, during Tuesday’s oral argument on the legality of the Disbursement Acceleration Program (DAP), said the Revised Administrative Code gives them such authority.

Article continues after this advertisement

Justice Roberto Abad asked the Budget chief to read the provision he was saying although he said “I know it’s not there.”

FEATURED STORIES

Justice Abad said it should not be the Revised Administrative Code which should be cited by the government in pushing for the DAP but the General Appropriations Act.

Petitioners alleged that the discretionary fund of the President violates the exclusive power of Congress to appropriate funds.

Article continues after this advertisement

Related stories

Article continues after this advertisement

Aquino: I am not a thief

Article continues after this advertisement

Estrada, Revilla: We didn’t steal too

Aquino defends DAP; ex-Chief Justice seeks people’s action vs pork

Article continues after this advertisement

P100M each for 6 senators from DAP

DAP funds still pork, says Lacson

DAP raised pork barrel by P13B in 2011, 2012

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Senators sought DAP transfer–Palace

TAGS: Nation, News

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.