EXPLAINER: What makes a nuclear weapon 'tactical'? | Inquirer News

EXPLAINER: What makes a nuclear weapon ‘tactical’?

/ 03:12 PM October 12, 2022

FILE PHOTO: A missile launch is seen at an undisclosed location in North Korea, in this undated photo released on October 10, 2022 by North Korea’s Korean Central News Agency (KCNA). KCNA via REUTERS

From the war in Ukraine to North Korea’s recent missile testing spree, tactical nuclear weapons are being debated and developed in a way not seen since the Cold War.

There is no universal definition of such weapons, and analysts note that the use of any type of nuclear device would break the “nuclear taboo” in place since the United States dropped atomic bombs on Japan in 1945, the only time they have been deployed in the war.

Article continues after this advertisement

Here are the characteristics of tactical nuclear weapons and why they have drawn so much attention.

FEATURED STORIES

WHAT IS A TACTICAL NUCLEAR WEAPON?

Tactical nuclear weapons are often characterized by their size, their range, or their use for limited military targets.

Article continues after this advertisement

They are often referred to as “non-strategic weapons,” in contrast with strategic weapons, which the U.S. military defines as designed to target “the enemy’s war-making capacity and will to make war,” including manufacturing, infrastructure, transportation and communication systems, and other targets.

Article continues after this advertisement

Tactical weapons, by contrast, are designed to accomplish more limited and immediate military goals that win a battle.

Article continues after this advertisement

The term is often used to describe weapons with a lower “yield,” or the amount of power released during an explosion.

They are typically many times larger than conventional bombs, cause radioactive fallout and other deadly effects beyond the explosion itself, and there is no agreed upon size that defines tactical weapons.

Article continues after this advertisement

Tactical weapons are often mounted on as missiles, air-dropped bombs, or even artillery shells that have a relatively short range, far less than the huge intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) designed to travel thousands of kilometers and strike targets across oceans.

However, many of these delivery systems can also deliver strategic nuclear weapons.

WHO HAS THEM?

Many of the world’s nuclear powers have weapons that are considered low-yield or meant to be used on the battlefield.

According to a March report by the U.S, Congressional Research Service (CRS), the United States has approximately 230 non-strategic nuclear weapons, including about 100 B61 bombs deployed with aircraft in Europe.

In 2018, the Trump administration announced plans for a new low-yield warhead for submarine-launched ballistic missiles (SLBMs), and a new non-strategic nuclear-tipped cruise missile.

Russia has 1,000 to 2,000 warheads for non-strategic nuclear weapons in its arsenal, the CRS report says.

North Korea said this week that its recent flurry of missile tests were designed to simulate showering the South with tactical nuclear weapons.

READ: Kim Jong-un vows to bolster nuclear combat capabilities with ‘all means possible,’ rejects dialogue

Experts believe that if North Korea resumes nuclear testing, it could include development of smaller warheads meant for battlefield use.

WILL THEY BE USED?

President Vladimir Putin, who rules the world’s biggest nuclear power, has repeatedly cautioned the West that any attack on Russia could provoke a nuclear response.

READ: Will Russia use nuclear weapons? Putin’s warnings explained

U.S. President Joe Biden said on Wednesday he doubted that Putin would use a nuclear weapon, and analysts have said tactical weapons could have limited military use in the vast and dispersed battlefields in Ukraine.

Earlier, Biden noted that the use of even small nuclear weapons could spiral out of control.

“I don’t think there’s any such thing as the ability to easily (use) a tactical nuclear weapon and not end up with Armageddon,” he said last week.

READ: Biden doubts Putin would use nuclear weapon, Ukraine pleads for more weapons

North Korea’s pursuit of the weapons, meanwhile, could represent a dangerous change in the way North Korea deploys and plans to use nuclear weapons, analysts say.

READ: South Korea’s Yoon says North Korea has nothing to gain from nuclear weapons

It has also prompted renewed debate in South Korea over redeploying American tactical nuclear weapons, which were withdrawn from the peninsula in the 1990s, or pursuing its own nuclear program.

North Korea says its nuclear weapons are for self-defense.

RELATED STORY

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

Nuclear ‘Armageddon’ threat back for first time since Cold War — Biden

TAGS: ICBM, Iran, North Korea, nuclear, Russia, War, weapon

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.