Prexy, VP debates reset due to unpaid bill for hotel venue | Inquirer News
KBP takes over as new event partner

Prexy, VP debates reset due to unpaid bill for hotel venue

/ 05:32 AM April 23, 2022

The Department of Information and Communications Technology (DICT) will activate the voter precinct finder on April 22, Commission on Elections (Comelec) Commissioner George Garcia said Thursday, 18 days before the May 9 polls.

Comelec Commissioner George Garcia speaks to the member of the press. John Eric Mendoza/INQUIRER.net FILE PHOTO

MANILA, Philippines — The Commission on Elections (Comelec) on Friday was forced to push back by a week its final presidential and vice presidential debates scheduled for this weekend after its event organizer, Impact Hub Manila, was unable to fully pay the hotel used as the venue and may face civil or criminal suits as a result, poll officials said on Friday.

Comelec Commissioner George Garcia announced at a press briefing that the presidential debate on Saturday and the vice presidential debate on Sunday would be moved to April 30 and May 1, respectively, with Kapisanan ng mga Brodkaster ng Pilipinas (KBP) replacing Impact Hub as the poll body’s new partner.

Article continues after this advertisement

According to Garcia, the Comelec learned that the company was unable to fulfill its payment obligations to Sofitel Philippine Plaza Manila only a few days ago when hotel representatives asked for its assistance regarding the alleged bouncing checks issued by Impact Hub.

FEATURED STORIES

Garcia clarified that the Comelec was not a party to the contract between Impact Hub and Sofitel as it was just an end user of “whatever is the agreement between our partner and the hotel management.”

“Of course, we did what we could for the last two days, so that they could come up with a good plan for them to set aside their differences,” Garcia said. “But as of last night, as of this morning, unfortunately, it seems that the [talks between the company and the hotel] are not moving in the right direction.”

Article continues after this advertisement

Demand letter

In an April 20 letter to Impact Hub, lawyers for Sofitel owner Philippine Plaza Holdings Inc. (PPHI) demanded that the company settle its unpaid obligations amounting to about P14 million, or 68.4 percent of the total contract price for staging the debates in the hotel.

Article continues after this advertisement

According to the letter from Ponce Enrile Reyes and Manalastas law offices, Impact Hub entered into a P20.6-million contract with PPHI on March 10 for the accommodation, banquet arrangements and technical requirements for the debates.

Article continues after this advertisement

Under the contract, Impact Hub must pay PPHI the total contract price in four tranches for five debates that had been scheduled for March 19, March 20, April 3, April 23 and April 24. Only the first three debates had been staged so far.

Last straw

The installments were to be paid on March 16 (P4 million), March 30 (P5.8 million), April 15 (P5.9 million) and April 20 (P4.9 million).

Article continues after this advertisement

The letter stated that five postdated checks signed by Impact Hub cofounder Celeste Rondario were “dishonored for being drawn against insufficient funds.” Despite the multiple bouncing checks, PPHI continued to provide services for the first three scheduled debates.

The last straw for PPHI was when unsettled obligations piled up to P14,095,000 as of April 20, just three days away from the penultimate Comelec-organized debate dubbed Pilipinas Debate 2022.

“Our client has given several concessions to hold the debates without following the agreed payment schedule,” the PPHI lawyers said. “Our client has repeatedly demanded payment of the full value of the dishonored postdated checks. However, you refused and failed, and continue to refuse and fail, to pay your obligations to our client.”

They said Impact Hub would face civil or criminal charges if the company failed to pay the hotel. The letter did not indicate a new payment deadline.

The Comelec en banc, or the seven-member poll body as a whole, would start its own investigation of Impact Hub’s unpaid bills, according to Commissioner Rey Bulay, who was also at the press briefing along with Commissioner Aimee Ferolino.

When asked why Impact Hub was the chosen debate partner, Ferolino said that the company was the Comelec’s partner in its “successful” voter registration campaign last year.

That success became the “gauge” for choosing Impact Hub again, “and we believed that they could mount a presidential debate,” she said.

The commissioners stressed that no taxpayer money was spent for the Comelec-organized debates because the poll body was barred by law from covering the cost of the debates using public funds.

Incubation hub

There was no immediate comment from Impact Hub officials.

The Filipino-owned incubation hub founded by Rondario in 2015 supports the development of business ventures.

It offers coworking spaces and private offices in several locations in Metro Manila, Cebu, Iloilo and Clark.

Besides hosting events like online conferences and bazaars, Impact Hub also has a network of students, professionals, start-up founders and CEOs.

The company is a part of a global network of impact innovation incubators, accelerators, coworking spaces and nonprofit organizations headquartered in Vienna, Austria. It operates independently from the Impact Hub Global Network. —WITH A REPORT FROM INQUIRER RESEARCH

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

RELATED STORY:
Jimenez, other Comelec execs asked to explain roles in debate mess

TAGS: Impact Hub

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.