QC court acquits 19 cops tagged in ex-Albuera mayor Rolando Espinosa slay | Inquirer News
Close  

QC court acquits 19 cops tagged in ex-Albuera mayor Rolando Espinosa slay

/ 09:49 PM October 06, 2021
QC court acquits 19 cops tagged in ex-Albuera mayor Rolando Espinosa slay

FILE PHOTO: Slain Albuera, Leyte Mayor Rolando Espinosa Sr. (INQUIRER/GRIG MONTEGRANDE)

MANILA, Philippines — The Quezon City Regional Trial Court (QCRTC) has acquitted 19 police officers of homicide over the death of Albuera town mayor Rolando Espinosa Sr. and a fellow inmate.

Atty. Roland Inting, who represented one of the accused, said the promulgation was conducted Wednesday afternoon via video conferencing at QCRTC Branch 104.

ADVERTISEMENT

According to Inting, none of the prosecution’s six witnesses was able to identify from among the accused that they were part of the group that supposedly killed Espinosa and another inmate, Raul Yap, inside the Baybay Sub-Provincial Jail in November 2016.

“If witnesses failed to identify an accused in open court, the case against the accused should be dismissed,” he said in a phone interview.

FEATURED STORIES

READ: Leyte Mayor Rolando Espinosa killed in ‘firefight’ inside jail

He also said that after the prosecution had finished presenting their evidence, they opted not to present any further proof.

The 19 police officers led by Col. Marvin Marcos were initially charged with murder.

A panel of prosecutors noted treachery in the death of Espinosa and Yap, that there was secrecy in the respondents’ raid, and that the respondents’ clearly outnumbered and outarmed the victims.

The panel’s resolution was based on the findings of the National Bureau of Investigation.

READ: NBI: Mayor Espinosa was murdered, defenseless

The police officers then filed a petition for review and sought to downgrade the case from murder to homicide.

ADVERTISEMENT

In granting the petition, the Department of Justice (DOJ) said there was nothing on record that indicates there was evident premeditation in this case.

“Not a single witness was present during the pre-operation meeting where it was surmised that the ‘plan’ was hatched by the respondents,” states the DOJ resolution.

On the use of excessive force, the DOJ says “the participation of the 19 police respondents during the incident does not meet this qualifying circumstance.”

“It is just reasonable and logical that a police operation requires several armed men to ensure its success, their protection, and security,” the resolution adds.

For the DOJ, “necessary force” was used to implement the search warrant since jail guards did not allow them to enter the facility.

It further noted that Espinosa and Yap tested positive for gunpowder, confirming the claims of the police that the two inmates fought it out.

READ: Case vs cops in Espinosa slay downgraded to homicide

Espinosa’s son, self-confessed drug lord Kerwin Espinosa, claimed that two of the involved police officers received payoffs from him.

The committees headed by Senator Panfilo Lacson and Richard Gordon said Espinosa was killed to cover up the involvement of some of the police officers in the illegal drug trade.

On March 31, 2017, Duterte said he is ready to pardon Marcos and the other police officers involved in the death of Espinosa and Yap. Once they plead guilty, he said he will grant them an absolute pardon.

RELATED STORIES

WHAT WENT BEFORE: Mayor Rolando Espinosa Sr. slay

Albuera police chief asks CIDG: Why was Espinosa killed over 1 gun?

KGA

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.
Read Next
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: court, Quezon City, Rolando Espinosa
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and
acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.



© Copyright 1997-2021 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.