Hong Kong man sentenced to 9 years in jail in first national security case | Inquirer News
Close  

Hong Kong man sentenced to 9 years in jail in first national security case

/ 04:03 PM July 30, 2021
A prison van arrives as police stand guard for Tong Ying-kit's arrival, the first person charged under a new national security law, in Hong Kong

A prison van arrives as police stand guard for Tong Ying-kit’s arrival, the first person charged under a new national security law, in Hong Kong, China, July 30, 2021. REUTERS/Tyrone Siu

HONG KONG — The first person convicted under Hong Kong’s national security law was sentenced to nine years for terrorist activities and inciting secession, judges said on Friday, in a watershed ruling with long-term implications for the city’s judicial landscape.

Former waiter Tong Ying-kit, 24, was accused of driving his motorcycle into three riot police last year while carrying a flag with the protest slogan “Liberate Hong Kong. Revolution of our times.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Tong’s lawyer, Clive Grossman, told reporters outside the court that they would appeal. He made no further comment.

Judges Esther Toh, Anthea Pang and Wilson Chan – picked by city leader Carrie Lam to hear national security cases – ruled on Tuesday that the slogan was “capable of inciting others to commit secession”.

FEATURED STORIES

On Friday, the judges sentenced Tong to 6.5 years for inciting secession and 8 years for terrorist activities. Of these, 2.5 years will run consecutively, resulting in a total term of 9 years.

“We consider that this overall term should sufficiently reflect the Defendant’s culpability in the two offenses and the abhorrence of society, at the same time, achieving the deterrent effect required,” they said in a written judgment.

Human rights groups, including Amnesty International, have criticized Tong’s conviction, saying it imposes new limits on free speech, as well as the precedents set by the trial, which they say contrast with Hong Kong’s common law traditions.

Tong was denied bail in line with a provision of the national security law that puts the onus on the defendant to prove they would not be a security threat if released. Tong also did not get a trial by jury because of “a perceived risk of the personal safety of jurors and their family members or that due administration of justice might be impaired”.

The Hong Kong government did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Hong Kong and Chinese authorities have repeatedly said that all the rights and freedoms promised to the former British colony upon its return to Chinese rule in 1997 were intact, but that national security was a red line. All cases have been handled in accordance with the law, both governments have said.

At a pre-sentencing hearing on Thursday, Grossman pleaded for lenience, saying any incitement was of a “minor nature” and Tong was a “decent young man” who did something “stupid”.

ADVERTISEMENT

Grossman added that Tong had been supporting his father and sister financially, and that his grandmother, who has cancer, hoped to give him “one last hug”.

Justice Toh declined to consider most of the mitigating factors, saying in the High Court that “if he had pleaded guilty, that would have been the greatest manifestation of … remorse.”

‘Secessionist’ agenda

Tong, who pleaded not guilty to all charges, was also found guilty of terrorist activities, with judges saying on Tuesday his motorcycle was potentially a lethal weapon and his actions “a deliberate challenge mounted against the police.”

In their reasons for sentencing, the judges wrote: “whoever carries out terrorist activities with a view to intimidating the public in order to pursue political agenda, whatever that is, should be condemned and punished.

“But when the political agenda is secessionist in nature, it is our view that there is an added criminality in that such an agenda is seeking to undermine national unification.”

An alternative charge of dangerous driving causing grievous bodily harm was not considered.

Tong’s trial focused mostly on the meaning of the slogan, which was ubiquitous during Hong Kong’s mass 2019 protests.

The arguments over its interpretation drew on topics such as ancient Chinese history, the U.S. civil rights movement and Malcolm X.

The judges said on Tuesday they were “sure that the Defendant fully understood the Slogan to bear the meaning of Hong Kong Independence.” Tong did not testify during the trial.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.
Read Next
Don't miss out on the latest news and information.

Subscribe to INQUIRER PLUS to get access to The Philippine Daily Inquirer & other 70+ titles, share up to 5 gadgets, listen to the news, download as early as 4am & share articles on social media. Call 896 6000.

TAGS: China, Hong Kong, Hong Kong national security law, Hong Kong pro-democracy protests, human rights abuses, Tong Ying-kit
For feedback, complaints, or inquiries, contact us.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and
acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.



© Copyright 1997-2021 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. To find out more, please click this link.