Drilon: House push on Cha-cha doomed | Inquirer News

Drilon: House push on Cha-cha doomed

/ 04:55 AM December 17, 2019

Missing phone, sim card? Sanchez’s wife may be ‘hiding something’ – Drilon

Senate Minority Leader Franklin Drilon (File photo EDWIN BACASMAS / Philippine Daily Inquirer)

MANILA, Philippines — Senators from the minority said the House of Representatives’ latest push for charter change through an unnumbered resolution would not fly, with Minority Leader Franklin Drilon saying the proposed term extension for lawmakers further jeopardized the move.

Senate President Vicente Sotto III reiterated that Charter change (Cha-cha) was not a priority in the Senate, though he said the upper chamber would study the House resolution if the measure is sent to it.

Article continues after this advertisement

“The House can do whatever it wants and then perhaps if they decide on something, then they can transmit it to us, and then we can talk about it if it’s transmitted to us,” Sotto told reporters.

FEATURED STORIES

But Sen. Ronald Dela Rosa said he was open to amending the Constitution to pave the way for the shift to a federal form of government.

Drilon said House members should not expect Cha-cha to progress in the upper chamber, especially with Sotto saying the matter was not a Senate priority.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Our counterparts in the lower house have the fighting spirit of a Filipino athlete. I do not want to dampen their spirit, but their Cha-cha is doomed,” Drilon said in a statement.

Article continues after this advertisement

‘Dead in the water’

He also hit the House proposal for a term extension of House and Senate members, which further put its endeavor in a bad light.

Article continues after this advertisement

“The term extension is ill-conceived. It extinguishes all the good intentions they may have in mind in pushing for Cha-cha. We will oppose it,” he said.

Sen. Risa Hontiveros also believes the House measure would arrive “dead in the water” in the Senate, and questioned the timing of the House proposal, with only two years to go in the Duterte administration.

Article continues after this advertisement

According to Hontiveros, there was no such “Resolution of Both Houses,” which was the one approved by the House.

She also noted that Sen. Francis Pangilinan, a member of the minority, chairs the committee on constitutional amendments.

She said that while Akbayan favors looking for the best form of government for the Philippines, she does not favor the Cha-cha project of President Duterte’s allies because “there were too many self-serving interests included.”

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

If the Constitution would be amended, she would prefer a constitutional convention as it was more participatory compared to a constituent assembly.

TAGS:

No tags found for this post.
Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.