Palace confident Diokno can explain alleged budget insertions | Inquirer News

Palace confident Diokno can explain alleged budget insertions

/ 03:24 PM December 10, 2018

Palace confident Diokno can explain alleged budget insertions

DBM Secretary Ben Diokno. Noy Morcoso / INQUIRER.net

MANILA, Philippines — Malacañang on Monday said Budget Secretary Ben Diokno can explain before the House of Representatives the alleged insertions in the proposed 2019 national budget.

Presidential Spokesperson Salvador Panelo said this after Diokno was summoned to explain the supposed insertions of some P52 billion for certain legislative districts, which lawmakers had blamed for the delay in the approval of the proposed P3.8-trillion national budget for 2019.

Article continues after this advertisement

“Let us hear him. They wanted to be enlightened that’s why they ask (him). It only means that they want to be enlightened, mukhang nalilito din (sila),” Panelo told reporters in an interview.

FEATURED STORIES

Asked if the Palace thinks Diokno can defend the budget, Panelo said: “I’m sure.”

READ: House to Diokno: Explain budget insertions

Article continues after this advertisement

Earlier, Senator Panfilo Lacson disclosed that the funds were allocated to certain House members, among them were Speaker Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, who received P2.4 billion worth of projects, and House Majority Leader Rolando Andaya Jr., P1.9 billion, for their respective districts.

Article continues after this advertisement

Lacson said the P4.3-billion fund allotted to the legislative districts of Arroyo and Andaya was pork.

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: Lacson: P2.4-B pork for Arroyo’s district

However, Panelo claimed that Arroyo has already reached out to Malacañang to explain the supposed P2.4 billion pork allocation to her district.

Article continues after this advertisement

The Palace official said Arroyo texted him earlier and claimed that these items originated from different government agencies and not from lawmakers.

“Contrary to the allegation of pork barrel, they (lawmakers) said that this time there were items and these items were given by different agencies. In other words, prior to the approval they’ve been there, unlike the pork barrel where there is no specific item where it will go,” Panelo said. /je

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

RELATED VIDEO

TAGS: Congress, favors of office, Local news, Malacañang, Nation, national news, News, Senate

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.