Imelda Marcos' lawyer asked to explain absence in court | Inquirer News

Imelda Marcos’ lawyer asked to explain absence in court

/ 02:43 PM November 19, 2018

The lawyer of former First Lady Imelda Marcos was given five days by the Sandiganbayan to explain his absence during the court’s hearing for the motion filed by Mrs. Marcos.

A written order issued by the Sandiganbayan’s Fifth Division on Monday said that lawyer Robert Sison was instructed to explain his absence during the hearing for the motion filed by his client seeking to avail of post-conviction remedies.

“Atty. Robert Sison is ordered to explain within five (5) days from notice, why he should not be fined for his failure to appear at today’s hearing,” the order said.

Article continues after this advertisement

Instead of Sison, lawyer Manuel Lazaro appeared on behalf of Mrs. Marcos before the anti-graft court.

FEATURED STORIES

The Sandiganbayan canceled Mrs. Marcos’ bail after she failed to attend the Nov. 9 promulgation where she was convicted of seven counts of graft.

A hearing was conducted last Friday where she was asked to explain the reason behind her absence. The court, then immediately reinstated and allowed her to post bail.

Article continues after this advertisement

READ: Imelda Marcos says absence during case promulgation due to ‘infirmities’

Article continues after this advertisement

Mrs. Marcos explained that Sison was hospitalized, so Lazaro need to take his place in court. /ee

READ: Imelda Marcos guilty of graft, ordered arrested

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our daily newsletter

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

TAGS: Local news, Philippines

Your subscription could not be saved. Please try again.
Your subscription has been successful.

Subscribe to our newsletter!

By providing an email address. I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy.

© Copyright 1997-2024 INQUIRER.net | All Rights Reserved

This is an information message

We use cookies to enhance your experience. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more here.